Founded by Managing Partner K.P. Sreejith, INDIALAW began as a small firm in Mumbai with a commitment to client service and corporate-focused legal solutions. From its modest beginnings, the firm has grown into a respected name by prioritizing excellence, integrity, and tailored legal strategies. INDIALAW’s team believes in adapting to each client’s unique needs, ensuring that solutions align with individual circumstances and business goals.
The firm combines its deep understanding of the local business landscape with experience across multiple jurisdictions, enabling clients to navigate complex legal environments effectively. INDIALAW emphasizes proactive service, anticipating client needs and potential challenges to provide timely, high-quality legal support. The firm values lasting client relationships and sees its role as a trusted advisor, dedicated to delivering business-friendly and principled legal counsel.
The Court examined the limitation period applicable to applications seeking revocation of probate under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act and the application of Article 137 of the Limitation Act.
If you receive a court notice but choose not to investigate it, can you later claim that limitation never started because you did not fully understand its significance?
In this episode, Divyanshi discusses the Supreme Court’s decision in Dhiraj Dutta v. Anirban Sen & Ors.
The Court examined the limitation period applicable to applications seeking revocation of probate under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act and the application of Article 137 of the Limitation Act.
The judgment reinforces the doctrine of constructive notice and the importance of acting diligently when a judicial notice concerns property in which a person claims rights.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
