India: Trials & Appeals & Compensation

The SC, in EPC Constructions India Ltd. v. Matix Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd., has, inter alia, held that preference shares are part of a company's share capital and therefore, the amounts paid towards preference...

The Respondents, Central Public Works Department (Respondent No. 1) and M/s. Supreme Infrastructure India Limited (Respondent No. 2), are parties in an ongoing arbitration.

The Delhi HC in its Judgement dated November 4, 2025, in writ petitions filed by Spice Jet Limited and LG Electronic India Private Limited challenging the 2008 and 2010 amendments to the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme...

The decision of the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in Vijay Kumar Dhawan and others v. Gurpreet Singh...

The High Court of Allahabad, through its judgment dated 19.11.2025 in Sonali Verma and Another v. State of U.P. and Others , held that proceedings under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act...

The Supreme Court of India, in the matter titled as Bharat Mittal v. State of Rajasthan and Others , through its judgment dated 18.12.2025, held that the appellate court may direct deposit under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ("NI Act") even against a director or authorized signatory convicted under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the NI Act.

Narendra Dingankar – Partner, shares the latest insights on The Repealing and Amending Act, 2025, and its key amendments to the Indian Succession Act, General Clauses Act, and Civil Procedure Code.

The Supreme Court's November 2025 ruling on the Aravalli range has started widespread debate, with critics arguing that it weakens environmental safeguards by permitting certain mining activities to continue.

Despite over three decades of settled jurisprudence, Indian commercial litigation continues to suffer from a basic and recurring jurisdictional error: the assumption that a suit can be validly instituted...