India: Tax Authorities

India is a key destination for cross-border investments, acquisitions and commercial transactions. In this regard, several foreign law firms partner or collaborate with Indian law firms and financial advisors or act independently to advise Indian clients and multinational groups on transactions, arbitrations and various matters requiring foreign law inputs. Such collaborations have resulted in an increased frequency of foreign law firm personnel visits to India.

In Income Tax Department v. Vikas Chaudhary & Ors., 2026:DHC:6605-DB, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court set aside the judgment of the learned Single Judge which had quashed a Look Out Circular (“LOC”) issued against Vikas Chaudhary at the instance of the Income Tax Department.

The Chennai Bench of CESTAT examined whether diagnostic kits using Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA) technology qualify for the same customs duty and IGST exemptions granted to Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kits under Indian tax notifications.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in jewellery manufacturing and wholesale business, was subjected to a surprise search on 16.08.2023 under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Cross-border service delivery is central to the operating model of most GCCs. The global capability center may be operating to strengthen finance, technology, analytics, procurement, or back-office functions for overseas group entities.

Most businesses have become comfortable with UAE corporate tax filing by now.  The deadlines are on the calendar, the forms are familiar, and finance teams are well into the rhythm. What fewer businesses have stopped to check is whether the accounting software they're running can actually keep up with what's coming next.  This includes everything from transfer pricing schedules to the phased rollout of e-invoicing.  This guide explains what that readiness actually looks like for finance directors, SME owners, and compliance officers working through UAE corporate tax compliance right now.

Seaview Developers Pvt. Ltd. (‘Assessee’) was engaged in the business of developing and leasing commercial real estate property in India, particularly an SEZ project in Uttar Pradesh. Being an SEZ developer/operator, the Assessee was eligible to claim deduction under section 80-IAB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) for profits derived from development and operation of the SEZ.

The Madras High Court has delivered a significant ruling on the constitutional limits of the GST Council's authority, specifically addressing whether this body possesses the power to ratify notifications issued by the Central Government under the CGST Act. The judgment examines the scope of powers available to constitutional and statutory bodies, establishing critical precedents for tax administration in India.

The Supreme Court's recent order in Tej Pratap Singh has reignited a fundamental debate about statutory authority in India's faceless assessment regime. When Parliament retrospectively inserted Section 147A to clarify which officer holds jurisdiction over reassessment notices, it transformed a procedural efficiency measure into a constitutional question about the limits of legislative intervention and the identity of the officer authorized by law to impose tax liabilities.