India: Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

In The High Court of Delhi M/s JSW Ispat Steel Limited (Now known As JSW Steel Limited) [Appellant] Vs. M/s Gas Authority of India Limited [Respondents

In the intricate dance of international commerce, a single word can be the difference between a swift resolution and a decade-long courtroom drama. In the landmark judgment of Nagreeka Indcon Products...

The National Company Law Tribunal, Kochi Bench, recently addressed a critical question regarding the rights of dissenting financial creditors in post-approval execution proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tiger Global has reset the standard for treaty entitlement in India. For international practitioners and in-house counsel advising on India-facing structures — whether cross-border holding arrangements...

This Connect provides a brief overview of the judgement of the Supreme Court in the Larsen & Toubro case where it examined whether an arbitral tribunal could award pre-award...

In the recent judgment in State Bank of India v. Amit Iron Private Limited & Ors. (“Judgment”), the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”)...

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (‘IBC’) was enacted to create a time-bound, creditor-responsive, and value-maximising insolvency framework. In practice, however, the system has been burdened by admission-stage delays, prolonged approval proceedings, liquidation inefficiencies, disputes concerning government dues, and uncertainty generated by frequent judicial elaboration of the statute.

The dispute arose from a Manning Agreement dated 26 December 2008 between the appellant i.e., M/s ABS Marine Services and the respondent i.e., Andaman & Nicobar Administration, for manning vessels operated by the respondent.

In Nagaraj V. Mylandla v PI Opportunities Fund-I and others, 2026 INSC 298, the Supreme Court of India applied the doctrine of transnational issue estoppel to dismiss objections to the enforcement of a Singapore Award in enforcement proceedings before Indian Courts. The Singapore Award was upheld by the Singapore High Court and the judgment debtors raised the same grounds to object to the enforcement of the Singapore Award by Indian courts.