ARTICLE
11 May 2026

RoDTEP – Goods Not Totally ‘restricted’ If Appropriate Quota Allows Export Subject To Certain Approval

LS
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan

Contributor

Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan (LKS) is a premier full-service Indian law firm specializing in areas such as corporate & M&A/PE, dispute resolution, taxation and intellectual property. The firm, through its 14 offices across India works closely on litigation and commercial law matters, advising and representing clients both in India and abroad.
The Bombay High Court has clarified a crucial aspect of export incentive eligibility, examining whether goods classified as 'restricted' can still qualify for RoDTEP benefits when export is permitted under specific quota approvals. This ruling addresses the tension between restricted export classifications and the availability of government incentive schemes for exporters who obtain proper permissions.
India International Law
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan are most popular:
  • within Transport and Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy and Law Firm industries

The Bombay High Court has reiterated that benefit of RoDTEP would be available on export of white refined sugar at a time when export of sugar was restricted.

The Department had denied the benefit relying upon Notification No. 10/2015-20, dated 24 May 2022 which stated the Export Policy of sugar as ‘restricted’, but permitted export of restricted sugar under specific permission from Directorate of Sugar, Department of Food and Public Distribution. Admittedly, RoDTEP benefit is not available on export of restricted goods. 

Allowing the benefit, the Court in Rika Global Impex Limited v. Union of India [TS 98 HC 2026 (BOM)] observed that sugar could not be considered to be a totally restricted/prohibited item for export at the material time so as to deprive the benefit of RoDTEP, as the notification permitted export of appropriate quota as may be approved by the Directorate of Sugar. 

According to the Tribunal, in such circumstances, benefits of the scheme cannot be denied to the exporters, who acted upon the scheme and undertook exports which are conducive to national interest. Gujarat High Court’s decisions in the cases Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd. and Satyendra Packaging Ltd., were also relied upon.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More