India: Shareholders

Subscribe
Business law and corporate law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering topics that involve business and corporate law produced by specialists working in this area every day.
Article
Tribunal Accords Strict Interpretation To Section 2(41A) To Deny Tax Neutrality To Demerger Where Shares Are Issued By The “holding Company” Instead Of The Company To Whom The Undertaking Is Demerged; Denies Carry Forward Of Losses Under Section 72A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961
Corporate demergers have long served as an effective mechanism for business reorganisation, enabling companies to segregate business verticals, streamline operations and facilitate strategic investments in a tax-efficient manner. It is not uncommon for group restructurings to involve transfer of an undertaking to a wholly owned subsidiary (“WOS”) while the consideration is discharged through issuance of shares by its holding company—a structure that has, on several occasions, received approval under the Companies Act, 2013.
India Commercial
VA
Vaish Associates Advocates
Article
Insurance 2.0 | IRDAI Invites Comments On Amendments To The Registration, Capital Structure, Transfer Of Shares And Amalgamation Of Insurers Regulations, 2024
Hot on the heels of adoption of the Sabka Bima Sabki Raksha (Insurance for All, Protection for All) (Amendment of Insurance Laws) Act, 2025 (Amendment Act), the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has begun translating the “Insurance 2.0” reforms into its operating framework. Our coverage of the journey so far is set out in our Ergos dated 9 December 2024, 3 February 2025, 5 September 2025, 18 December 2025, 16 January 2026, 4 February 2026 and 15 June 2026.
India Insurance
KC
Khaitan & Co LLP
Article
Company Law May (2026) Company Law Updates And Judgments
The Supreme Court examined whether an individual could be recognized as a company member for purposes of oppression and mismanagement proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956, despite lacking formal registration in the member registry. The case centered on whether the company's conduct in acknowledging proprietary interests—through directorship appointments and business investment utilization—could establish membership status for legal standing purposes.
India Commercial
HS
Hammurabi & Solomon
Article
Supreme Court Of India Clarifies That Formal Entry In Register Of Members Not Prerequisite For Maintaining Oppression And Mismanagement Proceedings
In the recent case of Dr. Bais Surgical and Medical Institute Private Limited and Ors. vs. Dhananjay Pande1, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) ruled that formal entry in a company’s register of members is not an absolute prerequisite for seeking relief in respect of oppression and mismanagement under Sections 3972 and 3983 of the Companies Act, 1956 (“1956 Act”) (that are in pari materia with Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“CA 2013”)).
India Commercial
J
JSA
Article
Piercing Of The Corporate Veil In India: When The Corporate Mask Slips
One of the most basic tenets of corporate law is the doctrine of separate legal personality. It acknowledges that a company is a legal person that is separate and independent of shareholders and directors. Although this principle promotes investment and prevents excessive liability, it may be also abused to avoid personal responsibility. In response to this abuse, the courts came up with the concept of piercing the corporate veil, which permits the court to lift the veil of incorporation to examine the fraudulent and criminal actions of the company in which the veil is incorporated.
India Commercial
Ka
Khurana and Khurana
Article
Beyond The Term Sheet: Navigating The Legal Minefield Of Startup Funding
For all intents and purposes, signing a term sheet is often confused with the end of a transaction in the Indian startup community - the world's third-largest in terms of recognised startups. Actually, the term sheet is just a non-binding ‘statement of intent’. The legal framework that influences the relationship between a startup and its investors is finalized during the weeks and months to come and is far more important and far more intricate than the terms of the investment.
India Commercial
Ka
Khurana and Khurana
Article
Investor Education And Protection Fund: From Forgotten Dividends To A Core Governance Test
Over the life of a company, small amounts quietly accumulate dividends that are never encased, old deposits that are not claimed, shares that sit in forgotten folios. Indian law does not allow these sums to remain with companies indefinitely. Instead, they must eventually move into a central pool called the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF), managed by a government authority.
India Commercial
LegaLogic
See more