Germany: Trials & Appeals & Compensation

Subscribe

Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.

LD Düsseldorf, August 5, 2025, Default Judgment, UPC_CFI_318/2025

The court may issue a default judgment if the defendant does not file a statement of defense within the prescribed period...

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, August 13, 2025, Order Concerning An Application For Provisional Measures, UPC_CoA_446/2025, UPC_CoA_520/2025

The grant or application for a marketing authorisation alone is insufficient to establish imminent infringement. Additional steps are required for the threshold to be met...

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

The UPC Has Already Reshaped The European Litigation Landscape: Insights From Its First Two Years

Rapid Growth and Significant Impact: Since its start two years ago, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) has rapidly grown in case volume and significantly impacted the European and global patent landscapes...

FH

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

IP Quick Tip: The Limits Of UPC Cross-border Powers (Video)

The recent judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union in "BSH versus Electrolux" strengthens the options for cross-border patent litigation. What are the implications for the Unified Patent Court...

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

International Arbitration Comparative Guide

Germany Litigation

HS

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

LD Mannheim, July 16, 2025, Order Concerning Request For The Extension Of Time Periods

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

CoA, July 15, 2025, Review Of Orders To Preserve Evidence, UPC_CoA_327/2025, UPC_CoA_002/2025

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

CoA, July 12, 2025, Decision Concerning Application For A Decision By Default (R. 355 RoP)

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

CoA, Order Of July 12, 2025, R 220.2 RoP Appeal On Security For Costs

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

UPC Monthly Report 06/2025

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

FCO Tightens Grip On Cartels With Increasing Number Of Dawn Raids And Court Proceedings

Germany Anti-trust

LS

Luther S.A.

CoA, July 10, 2025, Procedural Order Concerning An Application For Suspensive Effect, UPC_CoA_581/2025

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, July 3, 2025, Order Re. Members Of Confidentiality Club, UPC_CoA_221/2025 Et Al

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Mannheim, June 27, 2025, Request For Time Extension, UPC_CFI_344/2025

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Company Pension Schemes: Must-haves And Minimisation Of Liability When Implementing By Means Of Direct Insurance

Germany Employment

OP

Oppenhoff

Job Architecture: The Key To Modern HR Work And Legally Compliant Remuneration

Germany Employment

OP

Oppenhoff

Focus IT&C – 2nd Quarter 2025

European Union Privacy

OP

Oppenhoff

ESRB Annual Report On Activities In 2024: Key Developments, Supervisory Priorities And Regulatory Implications

Germany Finance

PL

PwC Legal Germany

International Arbitration Comparative Guide

Germany Litigation

HS

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Court Of Appeal, July 3, 2025, Revocation Action, UPC_CoA_178/2025

Revocation actions and counterclaims for revocation are treated as separate actions, even if jointly decided in a single document by the Court of First Instance. Each action requires its own appeal fee.

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Munich, July 2, 2025, Procedural Order On Security For Procedural Costs (R. 158 RoP), UPC_CFI_245/2025

While the intervener is to be treated as a party pursuant to Rule 315.4 RoP and may be liable for cost reimbursement as such, this is a different question from whether they have to provide...

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, July 3, 2025, Order Re. Appeal Against Cost Decision, UPC_CoA_153/2025

The cost decision after the withdrawal of an action (or a request for provisional measures) is made in accordance with the general regulations in Rules 150 et seqq. RoP.

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, June 26, 2025, Order Concerning Security Of Costs And Disposal Of An Action That Has Become Devoid Of Purpose

If an action becomes devoid of purpose because a party withdraws its main requests—having knowingly taken the risk that the urgent interest in those requests might lapse before a final decision...

Germany Litigation

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, June 23, 2025, Order Concerning An Application For The Revocation Of Provisional Measures, UPC_CoA_286/2025

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, June 20, 2025, Order Concerning Security For Costs (R. 158 RoP), UPC_CoA_393/2025

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, June 6, 2025, Decision, UPC_CoA_618/2024

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Mannheim, June 6, 2025, Procedural Order In Infringement Action, UPC_CFI_745/2024

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, June 6, 2025, Procedural Order, UPC_CoA_434/2025

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, May 30, 2025, Orders, UPC_CoA_845/2024, UPC_CoA_50/2025

Germany Litigation

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, June 2, 2025, Order, UPC_CoA_156/2025

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, May 21, 2025, Order On Application For Suspensive Effect, UPC_CoA_365/2025

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Dusseldorf, May 21, 2025, Order On Application For Cost Security, UPC_CFI_758/2024

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Mastering Complexities In EU Copyright Law: A Discussion On The Opinion Of Advocate General Szpunar In The Mio And USM Haller Cases Delivered On 8 May 2025 (Joined Cases C-580/23 And C-795/23)

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, June 2, 2025, Order, UPC_CoA_156/2025

The Court's jurisdiction extends to acts of infringement before the UPCA's entry into force, provided the patent is within the UPC's competence at the time of action

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, May 21, 2025, Order On Application For Suspensive Effect, UPC_CoA_365/2025

Pursuant to Article 74(1) UPCA, an appeal does not have suspensive effect unless the Court of Appeal decides otherwise upon a reasoned request by a party.

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Dusseldorf, May 21, 2025, Order On Application For Cost Security, UPC_CFI_758/2024

Requirements for requesting cost security based on undue burden of enforcement in a foreign jurisdiction

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Mastering Complexities In EU Copyright Law: A Discussion On The Opinion Of Advocate General Szpunar In The Mio And USM Haller Cases Delivered On 8 May 2025 (Joined Cases C-580/23 And C-795/23)

On 8 May 2025, Advocate General Szpunar issued his long-awaited Opinion in two pending referrals to the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Mio and USM Haller/konektra cases...

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Düsseldorf, 16 April 2025, Order, UPC_CFI_539/2024

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

UPC Court Of Appeal, Order Of April 30, 2025, UPC_CoA_5/2025 (See Also UPC_CoA_237/2025)

In an action for revocation, where both parties agreed to a stay, the appeal proceedings have been stayed pending the outcome of parallel opposition proceedings before the EPO Boards of Appeal...

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Design Grace Period: European Court Provides Clarity On Scope And Application

On March 12, 2025, the European General Court (Second Chamber) delivered a significant judgment in Case T-66/24 between Lidl Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG ("Lidl") and EUIPO/Liquidleds Lighting Corp.

European Union IP

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Generating, Accessing, And Displaying Lineage Metadata: Technical

This decision concerns a European patent application relating to data structures and methods for generating, accessing, and displaying lineage metadata, e.g. lineage of an element of data stored in a data storage system.

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Duesseldorf, March 7, 2025, Decision Of Court Of First Instance, UPC_CFI_459/2023

The nullity plaintiffs raised two new validity attacks during the oral hearing: a novelty attack based on D7 (Onsemi) and an inventive step attack combining D3 (Nguyen) and D4 (Lürkens).

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Eye-Tracking To Automatically Detecting User Interactions: Technical

Germany Litigation

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, March 3, 2025, Order, UPC_CoA_523/2024

Germany Litigation

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

UPC Monthly Report 02/2025

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Munich, February 25, 2025, Reimbursement Of Court Fees, UPC_CFI_208/2023, UPC_CFI_220/2024, UPC_CFI_221/2024

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Munich, February 24, 2025, Decision Regarding Award Of Costs, UPC_CFI_2/2023

Germany Litigation

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Munich, February 14, 2025, Order On Preliminary Objection, UPC_CFI_437/2024

Germany Litigation

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, February 14, 2025, Order On Request For Provisional Measures, UPC_CoA_382/2024

Germany Litigation

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, February 11, 2025, Appeal Of A Panel Review Order Regarding Right To Represent, UPC_CoA_563/2024, APL_53716/2024

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Helsinki, February 11, 2025, Procedural Order Regarding Changes In A Case, UPC_CFI_214/2013

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

LD Munich, February 12, 2025, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_714/2024

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Court Of Appeal, February 12, 2025, Order Concerning Representation, UPC_CoA_634/2024, UPC_CoA_635/2024, UPC_CoA_636/2024

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

CoA, February 12, 2025, Order For The Protection Of Confidential Information UPC_CoA_621/2024

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

UPC Monthly Report 01/2025

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

The Evolving Role Of AI In German Dispute Resolution

Germany Technology

HM

Hengeler Mueller

RD Nordic-Baltic, January 21, 2025, Procedural Order On Costs For Access To Pleadings And Evidence, UPC_CFI_380/2023

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

See more

Latest Videos

See more

IP Quick Tip: The Limits Of UPC Cross-border Powers (Video)

BP

Bardehle Pagenberg

Video | Ruud Brunninkhuis | Webinar Academie voor de Rechtspraktijk | 17 juni 2024

B

Buren

Online Conference "Changes To Legislation In The Czech Republic In 2024" (Změny v Legislativě 2024) (Video)

K

Kinstellar

When Spectators Take The Hit – Spectator Litigation In Ireland (Video)

WF

William Fry

LOGRAR LA EFICACIA EXTRATERRITORIAL DE RESOLUCIONES JUDICIALES (Videos)

HS

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More