1. Key takeaways
Claim construction
While terms used in patent documents should be given their normal meaning in the relevant art, the description and the drawings, when considered in the context of document's contents and not in isolation, may give these terms a different meaning.
In the case at hand, the Court affirmed, applying this principle, that according to the ordinary meaning of the wording in common language, as well as in the context of the description and drawings of the patent, the term "a working surface" was to be interpreted as meaning "one working surface".
2. Division
CD Paris
3. UPC number
UPC_CFI_239/2024
4. Type of proceedings
Revocation Action
5. Parties
Claimant: Anonymous
Defendant: Essetre Holding spa
6. Patent(s)
EP 2 875 923 B1
7. Body of legislation / Rules
CD-Paris_28_07_2025_UPC_CFI_239_2024
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
