- within Tax topic(s)
- with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
- in United States
- with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy industries
What the CRA's 2024–2025 Report Reveals About Accountability, Privacy, and Public Trust
The Canada Revenue Agency occupies a central role in administering Canada's tax system, collecting public revenue, and safeguarding confidential taxpayer information. Given the scope of this mandate, public confidence in the CRA depends not only on legislative authority but also on the integrity, conduct, and accountability of its employees.
The CRA's 2024–2025 Annual Report on Employee Misconduct and Wrongdoing provides a detailed overview of how the Agency identifies, investigates, and disciplines internal misconduct. For taxpayers, business owners, and professionals—particularly those engaged in audits, assessments, objections, or tax litigation—the report offers meaningful insight into how the CRA addresses internal compliance failures while continuing to administer Canada's tax laws.
Understanding CRA Employee Misconduct and Wrongdoing
The CRA distinguishes clearly between employee misconduct and wrongdoing, applying different legal and administrative frameworks to each.
Employee misconduct generally refers to actions or omissions that breach CRA policies, employment obligations, or the CRA Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct. Examples include unauthorized access to taxpayer information, improper handling of confidential data, misuse of CRA assets, timekeeping irregularities, or conduct inconsistent with a respectful workplace.
Wrongdoing, as defined under the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act, involves more serious matters, including contraventions of federal law, misuse of public funds, gross mismanagement, or actions posing a substantial risk to health, safety, or the environment.
For the 2024–2025 fiscal year, the CRA reported no founded cases of wrongdoing resulting in discipline, while confirming a significant number of founded misconduct cases.
Key Findings From the 2024–2025 CRA Misconduct Report
The CRA identified hundreds of founded misconduct cases nationwide, resulting in disciplinary measures ranging from written reprimands to suspensions and terminations. Suspensions represented the most common outcome, followed by reprimands and disciplinary dismissals.
A notable portion of these cases involved privacy-related misconduct, including unauthorized access to taxpayer accounts. In material cases, affected taxpayers were notified directly, reinforcing the CRA's obligation to protect confidential taxpayer information.
From a governance standpoint, the CRA emphasized that increased reporting reflects strengthened internal controls, detection mechanisms, and transparency rather than a systemic decline in employee integrity.
Privacy Breaches and Unauthorized Access to Taxpayer Information
Failures to protect taxpayer information represented the largest category of misconduct. These incidents included employees accessing their own tax records or the records of others without authorization, improper transmission of sensitive data, and failure to follow secure workstation protocols.
For taxpayers in Ontario and across Canada, these findings underscore the importance of CRA privacy safeguards and the seriousness with which unauthorized access is treated internally. They also highlight why taxpayers involved in audits, assessments, or tax litigation should remain attentive to how their information is accessed and handled.
CRA Investigations, Discipline, and Internal Accountability
Allegations of misconduct are investigated through internal affairs, management oversight, and labour relations processes. Employees are afforded procedural fairness, including grievance rights under applicable collective agreements.
These internal disciplinary processes are distinct from taxpayer-facing enforcement activities. While internal misconduct may raise governance concerns, it does not, by itself, determine the validity of a tax audit, tax assessment, or reassessment.
Criminal Prosecutions of CRA Employees: What the Public Record Shows
Although the CRA's annual misconduct report focuses on internal discipline, employee misconduct can, in rare circumstances, lead to criminal prosecution. Criminal charges fall outside the CRA's employment framework and are pursued by law-enforcement authorities where conduct meets the threshold for offences under the Criminal Code or the Income Tax Act.
Public records confirm that former CRA employees have been charged and, in some cases, convicted where misconduct involved fraud against the Crown, breach of trust by a public officer, or unauthorized use of CRA computer systems. A prominent recent example arose during the administration of COVID-19 emergency benefits, where a former CRA employee was charged by the RCMP for allegedly fraudulently obtaining benefits while employed by the Agency, using privileged system access. Charges included fraud, breach of trust, unauthorized use of a computer, and offences relating to confidential information under the Income Tax Act.
Historical cases also exist in which former CRA employees were convicted after improperly accessing taxpayer accounts and facilitating unauthorized refunds. These cases demonstrate that, while criminal prosecutions of CRA employees are uncommon, they do occur where misconduct involves deliberate deception, misuse of confidential taxpayer data, or significant financial harm.
The distinction is critical. Internal discipline addresses employment misconduct, while criminal prosecution addresses violations of criminal or federal tax law. When the threshold for criminal conduct is met, matters are referred to police and proceed independently through the justice system.
Pro Tax Tips
Taxpayers should not assume that CRA employee misconduct or prosecution automatically affects the validity of a tax audit or assessment. Legal challenges must be grounded in substantive tax law and procedural fairness, not internal employment outcomes.
If you are notified that your taxpayer information was involved in a CRA privacy breach, preserve all correspondence and seek guidance from an experienced tax lawyer in Canada regarding potential remedies and protective steps.
Where concerns arise about improper CRA conduct affecting a file, early legal advice can help determine whether access-to-information requests, administrative complaints, or procedural arguments are appropriate.
In contentious matters, including objections and tax litigation, focus should remain on statutory compliance, evidentiary issues, and applicable jurisprudence, including principles articulated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Jarvis distinguishing civil tax processes from criminal investigations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a CRA employee's criminal prosecution invalidate my tax audit or assessment?
No. A prosecution or conviction of a CRA employee does not automatically invalidate a tax audit, tax assessment, or reassessment. Each tax matter is determined on its own legal and factual merits.
Can employee misconduct be used to challenge a reassessment?
Only in limited circumstances. A successful challenge generally requires proof that the misconduct directly affected procedural fairness, evidence gathering, or statutory compliance in your specific case.
Does misconduct or prosecution stop ongoing CRA enforcement action?
No. CRA enforcement activities continue independently of internal employment or criminal proceedings unless a court orders otherwise.
Can misconduct support arguments in tax litigation?
Potentially, but only where there is a demonstrable connection between the misconduct and the integrity of the tax process. Courts focus on evidence, statutory authority, and due process rather than internal discipline outcomes.
Will the CRA notify taxpayers if their information is involved in a breach?
Yes. Material privacy breaches trigger notification to affected taxpayers under CRA policy.
Key Takeways
The CRA's 2024–2025 Annual Report on Employee Misconduct and Wrongdoing reflects a continued emphasis on transparency, accountability, and public trust in Canada's tax administration. While internal misconduct cases are addressed through discipline, rare instances of criminal prosecution demonstrate that misuse of position and taxpayer information can attract serious legal consequences.
For taxpayers, entrepreneurs, and professionals navigating audits, assessments, objections, or tax litigation, the key takeaway remains clear. Internal CRA misconduct and employee prosecutions are distinct from the legal validity of tax enforcement actions, which must always be evaluated on their own merits.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
