ARTICLE
15 April 2026

Cross-Border Trade Implications Of The U.S. Supreme Court’s IEEPA Tariff Decision: What Canadian Companies Should Know

WL
WeirFoulds LLP

Contributor

WeirFoulds LLP has established itself as one of Canada’s premier regional law firms and has provided strategic, cost-effective and innovative legal advice to our clients since 1860. We partner with our clients to offer full access to our business acumen and insights in four broad areas of practice: (1) Corporate; (2) Litigation; (3) Property; and (4) Government.
Lawyers at the New York offices of Withers recently provided a succinct analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump in an article published on March 31, 2026.
Canada International Law
Wayne T. Egan’s articles from WeirFoulds LLP are most popular:
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
WeirFoulds LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Insurance, Metals & Mining and Law Firm industries

Lawyers at the New York offices of Withers recently provided a succinct analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump in an article published on March 31, 2026. Their assessment highlights the Court’s conclusion that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) does not authorize the Executive Branch to impose tariffs, a finding that immediately rendered billions of dollars in duties collected through the IEEPA unlawful.

U.S. President Donald Trump had invoked the nearly 50-year-old IEEPA throughout 2025 to impose targeted tariffs on countries including Canada, Mexico and China, as well as a suite of sweeping tariffs that applied to other trading partners globally. The article underscores that this development has direct implications for businesses engaged in cross-border trade, with significant considerations for Canadian companies that may have absorbed tariff-related costs for goods that were not eligible for preferential tariff treatment under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (commonly referred to in Canada as CUSMA).

The authors note that the Court of International Trade (“CIT”) has directed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to issue refunds for all unliquidated entries subject to IEEPA duties, and that a new automated system is being developed to process the submission and reimbursement of any claims. There are, however, uncertainties regarding the refund process, and the U.S. government has indicated that delays are likely due to its existing technology and procedures not being equipped to refund payments of this scale or volume.

There is also the possibility that the U.S. government will appeal the CIT’s order, and clarification has not yet been given as to whether finalized liquidated entries, particularly those outside of the 180-day protest period, will qualify for reimbursement. These uncertainties create practical challenges for Canadian businesses, manufacturers and distributors who export to the United States and seek to recover amounts paid. Currently, there is no timeline as to when these issues will be resolved.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More