ARTICLE
17 October 2025

A Wing And No Prayer: Ontario Court Of Appeal Rejects A Franchisor's Appeal Of A Rescission Judgment

C
Cassels

Contributor

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a leading Canadian law firm focused on serving the advocacy, transaction and advisory needs of the country’s most dynamic business sectors. Learn more at casselsbrock.com.
As an update to a previous Cassels article,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a lower court decision granting a franchisee's rescission claim based on non-disclosure...
Canada Ontario Corporate/Commercial Law
Cassels are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services, Healthcare and Transport industries

As an update to a previous Cassels article,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a lower court decision granting a franchisee's rescission claim based on non-disclosure in respect of a "Wild Wings" franchise. A copy of the decision (2355305 Ontario Inc. v. Savannah Wells Holdings Inc.) can be found here.2 At trial, the franchisee (Jayasena) obtained a declaration in respect of rescission and resulting damages against the franchisor and several franchisor "associates" (as defined under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 (the Act).

All of the franchisor's grounds of appeal were rejected by the Court, including the main argument by the franchisor concerning whether it was in fact required to provide a franchise disclosure document at all. Specifically, the franchisor argued that it was entitled to rely on the Act's disclosure exemption under section 5(7)(a) whereby there was a resale of a franchise that was not effected by or through the franchisor. The Court upheld the lower court's finding that the parties entered into a new franchise agreement, thereby removing the ability to rely on the exemption. The Court made this finding despite a significant factual dispute between the parties concerning the validity of this new franchise agreement. The Court also held that the franchisor played "more than a passive role in the grant or transfer of the franchise" and thereby nullified the applicability of the exemption.

The Court also upheld the trial judge's damages determination and costs award. In respect of the latter, the Court confirmed the decision to award substantial indemnity-level costs due to an unaccepted offer to settle and the franchisor's allegations of fraud, collusion, and perjury against the franchisee and threats of collateral proceeding against counsel for the franchisee.

Footnotes

1. https://cassels.com/insights/a-wing-and-a-prayer-the-ontario-superior-court-of-justice-shoots-down-a-franchisors-exemption-defence-in-a-rescission-claim/

2. 2025 ONCA 505 (CanLII), (https://canlii.ca/t/kd6v3)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More