Canada: Contract of Employment

Subscribe
Employment law and labour law articles and thought leadership, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore articles covering topics such as Discrimination, Employee Benefits and Compensation, Health and Safety, Unfair/Wrongful Dismissal, Whistleblowing, Employment Rights, Outsourcing and Redundancy.
Article
Wigdor V. Facebook Canada Ltd. And The Problem With “Explicitly” Contracting Out Of Notice Periods
The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Wigdor v. Facebook Canada Ltd. awarded a former employee over US$4.7 million in Restricted Share Units, establishing that such benefits must continue vesting during statutory notice periods. This landmark ruling emphasizes the critical importance of statutory compliance in employment agreements, particularly following business acquisitions, and clarifies that forfeiture provisions cannot override employees' rights to contractual benefits during notice periods.
Canada Employment
CC
CLC (Canadian Litigation Counsel)
Article
Employeurs de compétence fédérale : êtes-vous prêts pour les nouvelles règles d’égalité de traitement?
À compter du 20 octobre 2026, les employeurs de compétence fédérale devront respecter de nouvelles exigences en matière d'égalité de traitement et de recours aux agences de placement temporaire. Ces dispositions introduites au Code canadien du travail précisent les critères permettant de comparer les employés, les écarts salariaux permis et les nouvelles obligations en matière de tenue de registres.
Canada Employment
L,
Langlois Lawyers, LLP
Article
Ontario Court Of Appeal Returns To A Practical, Common-sense Approach To Termination Provisions
Ontario's Court of Appeal has clarified the enforceability of termination clauses in employment agreements, addressing the growing uncertainty around contractual language that limits employee entitlements. The decision in Baker v. Van Dolder's Home Team Inc. provides practical guidance on how courts should interpret termination provisions, emphasizing a common-sense approach over technical scrutiny of hypothetical defects.
Canada Employment
MA
MLT Aikins LLP
Article
Ontario Court Of Appeal: Using The Words “at Any Time” Or “for Any Reason” In A Without Cause Termination Provision Does Not Breach The Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”)
The Ontario Court of Appeal has issued a landmark ruling on employment termination provisions, addressing whether contractual language permitting termination "at any time" or "for any reason" violates the Employment Standards Act. This decision overturns a controversial lower court ruling and provides crucial clarity for employers drafting termination clauses. The court emphasized a practical, contextual approach to interpreting employment contracts rather than isolating specific phrases.
Canada Employment
FR
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Article
Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 3 – August 7, 2025)
The Ontario Court of Appeal released multiple significant decisions during the week of August 3-7, 2026, addressing critical issues in employment law, medical malpractice, defamation, and property law. Notable rulings clarified the enforceability of termination provisions in employment contracts, particularly regarding "at any time" clauses and their consistency with Employment Standards Act minimum requirements, while also examining RSU entitlements and the application of statutory notice provisions.
Canada Litigation
BM
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Article
When “at Any Time” Doesn’t Mean “any Time”: A Welcome Dose Of Common Sense
The Ontario Court of Appeal has issued a landmark decision that may finally bring predictability to termination clause litigation. For years, employment agreements have been struck down over seemingly harmless phrases, leaving employers and employees uncertain about enforceability. Will this new ruling restore common sense to contractual interpretation, or will technical challenges continue to dominate employment law disputes?
Canada Employment
SL
Siskinds LLP
Article
Ontario Court Of Appeal Brings Clarity To Enforceable Termination Clauses
The Ontario Court of Appeal has issued a landmark decision reshaping how termination clauses in employment contracts should be interpreted, moving away from hyper-technical scrutiny toward a practical, contextual approach. Through two consolidated cases, the court addressed whether common contractual phrases like "at any time" violate employment standards legislation and provided crucial guidance on drafting enforceable for-cause provisions.
Canada Employment
C
Cassels
Article
A Tale Of Two Conclusions: Ontario Court Of Appeal Hands Down Significant Decisions On The Interpretation Of Employment Agreements
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times—and which side you are on may depend on which case you are reading. On August 6 and 7, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its highly anticipated decisions in Baker v. Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc.1, Li v. Wayfair Canada2, and Daniel Wigdor v. Facebook Canada Ltd. and Meta Platforms, Inc.3.
Canada Employment
TL
Torys LLP
Article
The Dufault Debate Is Over: Court Of Appeal Upholds “at Any Time” And “for Any Reason” Termination Language
The Ontario Court of Appeal has resolved a critical split in employment law jurisprudence regarding termination provisions containing "at any time" or "for any reason" language. In two consolidated appeals, the Court clarified when such provisions comply with the Employment Standards Act and under what circumstances employers can enforce contractual limitations on termination entitlements.
Canada Employment
MT
Miller Thomson LLP
See more

Highlighted Content