Article
BC Court Of Appeal Affirms That Liquidation Orders Can Be “Just And Equitable” When Sought For The Purpose Of Monetizing A Shareholder Investment
Prior to Golden Spigot, the Court emphasized that section 324 “must be exercised judicially, on a principled basis, and in recognition of the reluctance of the Court to interfere lightly in the internal affairs of a company”, requiring more than a shareholder’s desire to monetize an investment in cases where partners were unable to negotiate a share purchase. By contrast, the Court in Golden Spigot accepted that the very nature of partners operating a closely-held business means that they would reasonably expect that dissolution of the company would result in circumstances of deadlock.
Canada
Litigation