ARTICLE
17 December 2024

Superior Court Of Justice Defines That Contributions To PIS/Cofins Must Be Included In The State Vat Calculation Base

KL
KLA Advogados

Contributor

Founded on May 13th, 2002, in São Paulo, KLA has in its DNA the commitment to go beyond the services provided by traditional law firms and build long-term partnerships with its clients. KLA values a collaborative and development-oriented culture, investing in its professionals at every stage of their careers. The firm maintains a horizontal and barrier-free structure, where partners, lawyers, and interns sit side by side, engaged in a constant exchange of knowledge.
Decision has binding effects for all judges and courts, but it may still be subject to motions for clarification by the taxpayers...
Brazil Tax
KLA Advogados are most popular:
  • within Strategy, Transport and Accounting and Audit topic(s)
  • in European Union

Decision has binding effects for all judges and courts, but it may still be subject to motions for clarification by the taxpayers

The trial of the Topic 1223 of Repetitive Appeals was scheduled for this Wednesday (11) by the First Section of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), addressing the (il)legality of including PIS/COFINS in the calculation base of ICMS.

The Court ruled that the possible exclusion of PIS and COFINS from the ICMS calculation base would require express legal provision and decided on the impossibility of calculating the tax without including PIS/COFINS contributions in its calculation base.

The established thesis was: “The inclusion of PIS/COFINS in the ICMS calculation base complies with legality in cases where the calculation basis is the transaction value, as it constitutes an economic pass-through.”

The full text of the decision has not yet been made available. The ruling is binding on all judges and courts, but it may still be subject to motions for clarification by taxpayers, as well as an extraordinary appeal seeking to bring the matter before the STF under a constitutional perspective.

We will continue to monitor this issue and its developments in the Courts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More