ARTICLE
23 July 2026

Brazil Appeals Court Holds Pool Licence Offer Meets FRAND Obligation In Panasonic v HMD

The Rio de Janeiro Court of Appeals has issued a landmark ruling in a standard essential patent dispute between Panasonic and HMD, establishing that offering only a pool license can satisfy FRAND obligations under Brazilian law. The decision marks a significant development in Brazil's growing role as a venue for SEP licensing disputes and addresses questions about what constitutes good faith licensing behavior.
Brazil Intellectual Property
Licks Attorneys are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, Criminal Law and Environment topic(s)
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services industries

The Rio de Janeiro Court of Appeals has upheld a preliminary injunction against HMD in an Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) SEP case filed by Panasonic. In doing so, the Brazilian appellate court held, for the first time, that a licensor meets its FRAND obligation by offering an implementer only a pool licence.

The appeals court also called out HMD for its “uncooperative” and “delaying” conduct during the proceedings. 

As such, the ruling enriches Brazil’s FRAND case law as the country grows in popularity as a venue for SEP licensing disputes. It is also a setback for HMD, which is on the receiving end of various SEP lawsuits around the world.

Read more at: IAM

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More