- with Finance and Tax Executives
- with readers working within the Law Firm industries
Recently, Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) introduced the Multi-Class Stock Company Voting Transparency Act, which directs the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to improve the transparency of voting results at companies with multi-share classes and strengthen the quality of information available to investors. Specifically, the bill would require companies with two or more classes of stock to provide vote tallies that include a breakdown of results by class. According to the Council of Institutional Investors (“CII”), the number of companies with dual-class or multi-class stock has increased, with a third of companies that completed an IPO in 2025 having two or more classes of stock. Multi-class structures allow founders, executives, and early investors to retain voting control over corporate decisions even after selling a significant portion of the company’s equity to public shareholders. Proponents argue that these structures insulate management from short-term market pressures and enable the company to pursue its long-term strategic vision without interference.
Currently, under Item 5.07 of Form 8-K, companies are required to disclose the aggregate vote tallies for each matter submitted to a shareholder vote, including votes for, against, or withheld, as well as abstentions and broker non-votes, within four business days after the meeting. The bill would require multi-class companies to disclose the total number of votes cast for, against, or withheld, disaggregated by voting class as well as the total number of abstentions and broker non-votes disaggregated by voting class. In a statement, Rep. Casten noted that “Investors deserve to know whether the board’s response to the outcome of a proposal reflects the preferences of the majority of shareholders—or whether super vote shareholders swayed the results.”
Read the full bill and Rep. Casten’s press release.
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.
© Copyright 2026. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.
[View Source]