ARTICLE
10 November 2016

FINRA Fines Firms For Failure To Supervise Sales Of Variable Annuities

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

FINRA fined eight separate firms a total of $6.2 million for failing to supervise adequately the sales of variable annuities ("VAs") and for other sales practice violations.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, International Law, Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)
  • in European Union

FINRA fined eight separate firms a total of $6.2 million for failing to supervise adequately the sales of variable annuities ("VAs") and for other sales practice violations. FINRA also ordered five of the firms to pay more than $6 million to customers who purchased L-share variable annuities with potentially incompatible, complex and expensive long-term minimum-income and withdrawal riders.

FINRA stated that each of the firms failed to (i) supervise adequately VAs with multiple share classes, and (ii) provide registered representatives and principals with reasonable guidance concerning the narrow class of customers for whom the costs and features of L-share VAs are suitable. FINRA explained that L-share VAs are "complex investment products combining insurance and security features designed for short-term investors willing to pay higher fees in exchange for shorter surrender periods," and that L-share VAs had the "potential to pay greater compensation to the firms and registered representatives than more traditional share classes." According to FINRA, sales practice violations with respect to the L-share VAs were "compounded by the fact that the short-surrender L-shares were often sold with complex and expensive guaranteed income and withdrawal riders that provided benefits only over longer holding periods."

FINRA Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement Brad Bennett commented on the violations:

When a firm cannot explain why a significant number of clients are paying up for the short-term flexibility of L-shares while, at the same time, buying riders that only have value over the long term, it is clear that these supervisory obligations are not being met.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More