ARTICLE
15 October 2026

New York Court Strikes Down Pied-À-Terre Tax Rollout, While Constitutional Challenges Mount

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

A New York Supreme Court Justice has struck down the rollout of the pied-à-terre tax, ruling the Department of Finance's implementation plan arbitrary and capricious. The decision comes as two new constitutional challenges are filed against the tax, with prominent figures including former Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross arguing it unconstitutionally targets nonresidents of New York City.
United States Tax

The pied-à-terre tax (“PAT”) continues to make news and be at the forefront of City and State politics. Yesterday in an outright rejection of the Mamdani Administration's proposal, which went into effect on May 28, 2026, Supreme Court Justice Wayne M. Ozzi struck down the rollout of the PAT, ruling that the Department of Finance's plan was arbitrary and capricious and directing the City to start from scratch.

The Order specifically states that the City must remove the list of properties subject to the PAT from the Department of Finance website, prepare a revised list, and send new notices to the property owners included on that revised list. Though the current deadline for filing a pied-à-terre tax primary residence exemption is October 6, the deadline will most likely be changed again pending the issuance of the new notices. The City plans to appeal the decision and seek a stay of the Judge's Order thereby adding more uncertainty as to filing deadlines.

In addition, two new lawsuits were filed yesterday challenging the PAT's constitutionality. Former U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Steve Wynn of Wynn Hotels are the plaintiffs in one such lawsuit, arguing that the PAT is unconstitutional because it targets only nonresidents of New York City. The second lawsuit was filed by homeowners and trustees, along with a New York City cooperative corporation, likewise challenging the tax's constitutionality. Notably, REBNY is also supporting this lawsuit.

We will continue to monitor developments and provide updates as they occur and potential filing deadlines approach.

Co-authored with Ross Moskowitz.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More