ARTICLE
6 March 2026

FTC Issues Policy Statement On Age Verification Technologies Under COPPA

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is an international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major corporations, funds, and financial institutions in their most important and complex transactions and disputes.
On February 25, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a policy statement announcing that it will not pursue enforcement actions under the Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule ("COPPA Rule")...
United States Privacy
Lei Shen’s articles from Mayer Brown are most popular:
  • in United States

On February 25, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a policy statement announcing that it will not pursue enforcement actions under the Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule (“COPPA Rule”) against website and online service operators that collect, use, or disclose personal information solely to determine a user's age through age verification technologies.

The policy statement comes as operators prepare for the April 22, 2026 compliance deadline for the significant COPPA Rule amendments the FTC finalized in January 2025. The Commission also indicated its intent to initiate a formal review of the COPPA Rule to address age verification mechanisms more broadly.

Background

As states have begun introducing and passing legislation requiring certain websites and online services to deploy age verification mechanisms, operators have raised questions about how these requirements intersect with COPPA. In particular, some age verification technologies require the collection of personal information from children, prompting concerns that the verification process itself could trigger COPPA obligations.

FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson addressed this tension during the Commission's January 28, 2026 workshop on age verification technologies. He emphasized that the FTC does not view age verification as creating new legal obligations under COPPA, but rather as a tool that can help companies advance innovative compliance efforts while identifying when existing obligations apply. Christopher Mufarrige, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, echoed this view, describing age verification technologies as some of the most child-protective technologies to emerge in decades.

The Policy Statement

The FTC will not bring an enforcement action against operators of general audience or mixed audience sites and services that collect, use, or disclose personal information solely to determine a user's age (“Age Verification Purposes”) without first obtaining verifiable parental consent, provided the operator:

  • Does not use or disclose information collected for Age Verification Purposes for any other purpose;
  • Discloses information collected for Age Verification Purposes only to third parties that the operator has taken reasonable steps to determine can maintain the confidentiality, security, and integrity of the information, including by obtaining written assurances that such third parties will employ reasonable safeguards, will not use or disclose the information for any other purpose, and will delete it promptly after fulfilling the Age Verification Purposes;
  • Does not retain this information collected for Age Verification Purposes longer than necessary to fulfill those purposes and deletes it promptly thereafter;
  • Provides clear notice in its privacy policy to parents and children regarding the information collected for Age Verification Purposes;
  • Employs reasonable security safeguards for information collected for Age Verification Purposes; and 
  • Takes reasonable steps to determine that any product, service, method, or third party utilized for Age Verification Purposes is likely to provide reasonably accurate results as to the user's age.

Key Takeaways for Businesses

The policy statement offers reassurance to operators seeking to implement age verification technologies without concern that the verification process itself will trigger COPPA enforcement. However, the FTC's enforcement discretion applies only when personal information is collected, used, or disclosed solely to determine a user's age. Operators should not retain or repurpose personal information collected through age verification for other purposes if they wish to rely on this policy statement.

Importantly, the policy statement does not change the underlying COPPA Rule requirements. Operators must still comply with all COPPA obligations, including the 2025 amendments expanding the definition of personal information, enhancing notice requirements, mandating written information security programs, and imposing stricter data retention limitations.

Finally, companies should be aware that the FTC intends to initiate a formal review of the COPPA Rule to address age verification mechanisms. The policy statement will remain in effect until the FTC publishes final rule amendments on this issue or withdraws the policy statement.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2026. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2026. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More