ARTICLE
24 December 2021

Simplifying A Computer Process May Pass Alice Step Two

WT
Winston Taylor

Contributor

Whether you're leading the way, disrupting an industry, entering a new phase of growth, or launching a defining product—we're in the room with you. In the action. Sleeves rolled up.

With a rich history spanning both sides of the Atlantic, we are present in the major commercial centers that matter to our clients: the U.S., the U.K., Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Combining scale with the speed clients demand, our defining capabilities include major litigation, critical transactions, strategic IP, and private wealth.

Our team of over 1,400 lawyers works hand-in-hand across markets, sectors, practice areas, and client teams. All-in problem solvers, we bring the creativity to think differently, and the pragmatism to get things done when it counts the most.

Embedded in your business and sharing your ambition, we take the work personally. Shaping what we do and how we do it around your goals and needs, always one step ahead of the moment.

Cosmokey Solutions GMBH & Co. KG v. Duo Security LLC, FKA Duo Security, Inc., 2020-2043 (Fed. Cir. 2021)...
United States Intellectual Property

Cosmokey Solutions GMBH & Co. KG v. Duo Security LLC, FKA Duo Security, Inc., 2020-2043 (Fed. Cir. 2021)

Reversing the district court below, the Federal Circuit held that certain claims of the asserted patent are patent-eligible under Alice step two because they recited a specific improvement to a particular computer-implemented authentication technique.

The patent-at-issue was related to a method of authenticating the identity of a user performing a function on a computer involving an authentication function on that user's mobile device. Compared to prior-art systems, the invention purportedly simplified the authentication process by reducing the number of communication channels the process used.

The district court held that this was directed to an abstract concept, and that the elements of the claims did not transform the nature of the claims into a patent-eligible concept because they "merely teach[] generic computer functionality to perform the abstract concept of authentication[.]"

The Federal Circuit did not address step one of Alice because "even if [the Federal Circuit] accept[ed] the district court's narrow characterization of the [claims], the claims satisfy Alice step two." Proceeding to step two of Alice, the court held that the claim elements added material not known in the prior art, and that the ordered combination of the claims recited a specific technical improvement that reduced the complexity of the authentication process compared to prior-art systems. 

Read the full decision here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More