ARTICLE
24 March 2026

Following Lawsuit, HUD Indefinitely Delays Revocation Of 30-Day Notice Rule For Nonpayment Lease Termination

BS
Ballard Spahr LLP

Contributor

Ballard Spahr LLP—an Am Law 100 law firm with more than 750 lawyers in 18 U.S. offices—serves clients across industries in litigation, transactions, and regulatory compliance. A strategic legal partner to clients, Ballard goes beyond to deliver actionable, forward-thinking counsel and advocacy powered by deep industry experience and an understanding of each client’s specific business goals. Our culture is defined by an entrepreneurial spirit, collaborative environment, and top-down focus on service, efficiency, and results.
Last week, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) shifted the interim rule to revoke the 30 days...
United States Real Estate and Construction
Molly R. Bryson’s articles from Ballard Spahr LLP are most popular:
  • within Real Estate and Construction topic(s)
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Property industries
Ballard Spahr LLP are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring, Law Department Performance and International Law topic(s)

Last week, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) shifted the interim rule to revoke the 30 days' notice of nonpayment to a proposed rule. The proposed rule will go through notice-and-comment rulemaking and any changes will only be made with full consideration of public comments and the issuance of a final rule.

On February 26, HUD issued an interim rule revoking the requirement to provide 30 days' notice of nonpayment to tenants before initiating judicial eviction procedures in the public housing and voucher regulations. The interim rule was supposed to take effect in a few weeks, on March 30. For more on the interim rule, see our previous alert.

On March 2, a lawsuit was filed in D.C. District Court, challenging the interim rule for violating the Administrative Procedures Act (Jane Addams Senior Caucus, et al., v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al., 1:26-cv-00718 (D.D.C.)). The lawsuit alleged that there was no good cause to waive the full notice-and-comment rulemaking process and that HUD was acting arbitrarily and capriciously by not explaining the change in policy less than two years after enactment of the final rule.

Following the filing of the lawsuit, HUD changed the interim rule to a proposed rule. HUD published the new Notice in the Federal Register on March 13. The deadline to submit public comments is April 27.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More