ARTICLE
23 March 2026

“Bad Faith” Bankruptcy Dismissals In The Wake Of LTL Management: Recent Developments

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The article explains that LTL requires dismissal of a Chapter 11 case where the debtor is not “financially distressed,” sharpening the notion of a “valid bankruptcy purpose” while creating tension with the Bankruptcy Code’s lack of an express insolvency requirement.
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Casey Servais’s articles from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP are most popular:
  • in United States
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP are most popular:
  • within Law Department Performance, Government and Public Sector topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Banking & Credit industries

Cadwalader partner Casey Servais authored an article in The Review of Banking & Financial Services analyzing how courts have applied the “bad faith” bankruptcy filing doctrine following the Third Circuit’s 2023 decision in In re LTL Management, LLC. The article explains that LTL requires dismissal of a Chapter 11 case where the debtor is not “financially distressed,” sharpening the notion of a “valid bankruptcy purpose” while creating tension with the Bankruptcy Code’s lack of an express insolvency requirement.

Casey surveys decisions in the wake of LTL, including cases involving parent guarantees and Texas/Delaware divisional mergers, where courts dismissed filings as “bad faith” either because generous funding arrangements meant the debtor lacked genuine financial distress or because the debtor’s financial condition was transparently “manufactured.”

He also highlights a Delaware decision finding LTL’s “financial distress” standard satisfied where the debtor was balance‑sheet insolvent and contrasts the Third Circuit’s approach with the Fourth Circuit’s “objective futility” test, underscoring the potential for circuit splits and forum shopping.

Casey concludes that LTL has elevated “financial distress” as a practical gating issue for Chapter 11 in some jurisdictions, but that the doctrine remains “unusually ill‑defined,” leaving practitioners to navigate differing circuit standards and unresolved questions that may ultimately require Supreme Court guidance.

Read the full article here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More