ARTICLE
9 March 2026

Patrick Potter's Article, "Assessing The "Logic And Limits" Of Comparing European Union Preinsolvency Regimes To Chapter 11," Was Published By INSOL International

DW
Dickinson Wright PLLC

Contributor

Dickinson Wright PLLC, founded in 1878, is a full-service business law firm with 550+ lawyers across the United States and Canada, covering over 40 practice areas and industry groups. Headquartered in Detroit, the firm provides practical, business-focused legal solutions and invests in technology and personnel to support efficient, innovative service delivery. Dickinson Wright maintains independently verified information security and risk management controls, including ISO/IEC 27701:2019 certification, reflecting a commitment to protecting sensitive client matters. The firm handles complex transactions and high-stakes litigation and is regularly recognized by leading legal industry organizations for the quality of its work.
Patrick Potter's article, "Assessing the "Logic and Limits" of Comparing European Union Preinsolvency Regimes to Chapter 11," was published by INSOL International.
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Patrick Potter’s articles from Dickinson Wright PLLC are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)
  • in United States
Dickinson Wright PLLC are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring, Insurance and International Law topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Metals & Mining industries

Patrick Potter's article, "Assessing the "Logic and Limits" of Comparing European Union Preinsolvency Regimes to Chapter 11," was published by INSOL International. The article examines whether it is sound to treat EU pre-insolvency restructuring frameworks (PIRs) as equivalent to Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. It reviews the growing "fungibility" argument that PIRs and Chapter 11 are substantively similar and that PIRs are a cheaper, viable alternative. Through a review of legislative histories, eligibility standards, and structural features, the paper argues that the regimes were designed for different types of financial distress—PIRs for pre-insolvent debtors seeking early intervention, and Chapter 11 for debtors across the full spectrum of insolvency, including deeply distressed companies. To read more, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More