ARTICLE
7 October 2025

Federal Reserve Announces Update For One Firm's Individual Capital Requirements

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
As we previously reported, on August 29, the Federal Reserve Board ("FRB") announced the individual capital requirements for all large banks, effective on October 1.
United States Finance and Banking
Daniel Meade’s articles from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP are most popular:
  • within Finance and Banking topic(s)
  • in United States
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Metals & Mining industries

As we previously reported, on August 29, the Federal Reserve Board ("FRB")announced the individual capital requirements for all large banks, effective on October 1. This announcement follows theJune announcementon the results of the supervisory stress test (also known as the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test or DFAST, as these tests are required bySection 165of the Dodd-Frank Act), which assesses whether banks are sufficiently capitalized to absorb losses during a severe recession.

We also noted that one bank was requesting reconsideration of its Stress Capital Buffer or SCB. On Sep. 30, the Federal Reserve announced that after that reconsideration, Morgan Stanley's SCB would be reduced from 5.1% to 4.3%, meaning Morgan Stanley's CET1 requirement for this year is 11.8%.

Federal Reserve Governor (and former Vice Chair of Supervision) Michael Barr released a statement along with the FRB's announcement stating "[c]onsistent with my view that the Board should use its inherent authority to set individualized capital requirements when appropriate, I support this modified capital requirement. I look forward to seeing the Board use its authority to adjust capital requirements when they are too low, as well as when they are too high, given the risks posed by individual firms."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More