ARTICLE
25 August 2025

DFPI Orders Mortgage Lender To Pay $2.3 Million For Per Diem Interest Overcharges

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On August 18, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) announced a $2.3 million settlement with a former mortgage lender and servicer for alleged violations...
United States California Finance and Banking
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

On August 18, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) announced a $2.3 million settlement with a former mortgage lender and servicer for alleged violations of the California Residential Mortgage Lending Act and California Financing Law. According to the DFPI, the company improperly charged thousands of California borrowers per diem interest in excess of what is permitted under state law.

The settlement follows DFPI examinations dating back to 2016, which identified both per diem overcharges and failures to maintain borrower trust accounts in compliance with the California Residential Mortgage Lending Act. The DFPI required the company to conduct a self-audit and issue refunds to consumers. The matter was resolved ahead of a scheduled administrative hearing.

As part of the settlement, the company refunded $550,316 plus 10% annual interest to impacted borrowers and agreed to surrender both its California Financing Law and California Residential Mortgage Lending Act licenses. The company also paid $1.8 million in administrative penalties.

Putting It Into Practice: The settlement comes as California expands its focus on mortgage issues, including recent legislation revising mortgage servicing and foreclosure requirements (previously discussed here). These developments show a renewed emphasis on borrower protections. Mortgage lenders and servicers operating in California should expect ongoing scrutiny of origination and servicing practices and ensure that compliance procedures are updated accordingly.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More