ARTICLE
22 March 2021

Firm Settles FINRA Charges For Supervisory Violations On The Sale Of Variable Annuities

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

A firm settled FINRA charges for selling variable annuities without properly implementing the firm's written supervisory procedures on recommendations and sales.
United States Finance and Banking
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences and Transport topic(s)

A firm settled FINRA charges for selling variable annuities without properly implementing the firm's written supervisory procedures on recommendations and sales.

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, FINRA found that the firm failed to enforce and update its procedures requiring customers to:

  • review the expense ratios of different variable annuities; and
  • complete a Variable Annuity Disclosure Form prior to investment.

The firm also failed to record the investment objective and risk tolerance for several customers who purchased variable annuities.

As a result, the firm violated FINRA Rules 2330 ("Members' Responsibilities Regarding Deferred Variable Annuities"), 3110(b) ("Supervision; Written Procedures") and 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade").

To settle the charges, the firm agreed to (i) a censure and (ii) a $15,000 fine.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More