ARTICLE
19 October 2022

Linda Coberly Discusses The Revival Of The Equal Rights Amendment In The D.C. Circuit With Bloomberg Law

WT
Winston Taylor

Contributor

Whether you're leading the way, disrupting an industry, entering a new phase of growth, or launching a defining product—we're in the room with you. In the action. Sleeves rolled up.

With a rich history spanning both sides of the Atlantic, we are present in the major commercial centers that matter to our clients: the U.S., the U.K., Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Combining scale with the speed clients demand, our defining capabilities include major litigation, critical transactions, strategic IP, and private wealth.

Our team of over 1,400 lawyers works hand-in-hand across markets, sectors, practice areas, and client teams. All-in problem solvers, we bring the creativity to think differently, and the pragmatism to get things done when it counts the most.

Embedded in your business and sharing your ambition, we take the work personally. Shaping what we do and how we do it around your goals and needs, always one step ahead of the moment.

Linda Coberly, Winston & Strawn partner and chair of the ERA Coalition's Legal Task Force, spoke with Bloomberg Law recently about the litigation over the Equal Rights Amendment...
United States Government, Public Sector
Winston Taylor are most popular:
  • within Media, Telecoms, IT and Entertainment topic(s)

Linda Coberly, Winston & Strawn partner and chair of the ERA Coalition's Legal Task Force, spoke with Bloomberg Law recently about the litigation over the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) and the importance of having the ERA formally recognized and published by the Archivist.

The Attorneys General of Illinois, Virginia, and Nevada—the last three necessary states to ratify the ERA—filed a mandamus action against the National Archivist in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 2020. The suit sought an order compelling the Archivist to comply with her statutory duty to publish the ERA after receiving the number of ratifications required by Article V of the Constitution. The district court dismissed the suit for lack of standing, noting in the alternative that the seven-year time limit included in Congress's proposing clause stood in the way of the ERA's effectiveness and relieved the Archivist of any duty to publish, given that the last three ratifications took place after that time limit had passed. Illinois and Nevada appealed, and the D.C. Circuit heard argument last week.

In support of the district court's conclusion on standing, the Department of Justice pointed to the debate about the validity of the ERA and the fact that publication would not resolve it. Commenting on this argument, Linda said, "The executive branch is saying the existence of the debate is exactly why the archivist shouldn't publish it, and I think that has it backwards." Although both sides agree that publication would not resolve the legal dispute about the ERA's validity, publication remains important and would have significant practical consequences. Among other things, "[w]hen you go to buy your pocket Constitution, it should have the Equal Rights Amendment in it," Linda said. "If there's no published, official version of the Constitution with the Equal Rights Amendment in it, that has an undeniable impact on how people behave."

Read the full article here.

Read about Winston's commitment to the ERA here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More