ARTICLE
28 March 2025

Briefcase 2025 Quarter 1: Key Real Estate Cases And Updates

BC
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Contributor

We build lasting relationships that deliver impact. Clients trust us because we invest in real partnerships and work faster and smarter to provide quality advice that supports success. We understand where they need to go and how they can get there.

Connecting the dots between client goals, market dynamics and the law is what we do best. Our one-firm structure, international reach and culture of collaboration ensures clients can access integrated, specialist advice wherever they need it.

The court refused to grant an interim injunction to pause construction that would significantly interfere with a neighbour's rights to light. Instead, the Court ordered an expedited trial.
United Kingdom Real Estate and Construction
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring, Government and Public Sector topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Environment & Waste Management industries

Case 1: Handston Investments Limited v Abri Group Limited

The court refused to grant an interim injunction to pause construction that would significantly interfere with a neighbour's rights to light. Instead, the Court ordered an expedited trial.

Watch/listen >

Read more >

Case 2: Beeches Capital v Hunt & Ors

The Upper Tribunal granted the modification of a restrictive covenant, which prevented the erection of non-agricultural buildings, to allow a rural business and enterprise hub to be built.

Watch/listen >

Read more >

Case 3: Iya Patarkatsishvili and Yevhen Hunyak v William Woodward-Fisher

A sale contract of a high-value residential property in London was reversed because the seller had given false replies about the extent of a moth infestation.

Watch/listen >

Read more >

Case 4: Khan v D'Aubigny

Documents that the landlord was required by statute to serve on the tenant before serving a section 21 notice were deemed served under the notice provisions of the AST.

Watch/listen >

Read more >

Case 5: Stiaan van Zyl and Tersia van Zylv Peter James Walker-Smith

A couple who removed a shared hedge and replaced itwith a fence, withouttheir neighbour'sagreement, are foundto have committed trespass, and areordered to pay damages and costs.

Watch/listen >

Read more >

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More