South Africa: Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
CAC Clarifies Competition Commission's Investigative Duties And The Threshold For Non-referral
The Competition Appeal Court recently examined the extent to which South Africa's Competition Commission must investigate complaints before declining to pursue them, and whether complainants can challenge such decisions. In Nevilles Tours and Logistics v The Competition Commission, the court addressed a bus operator's allegations of predatory and excessive pricing by dominant competitors, finding the Commission's initial investigation inadequate and setting new standards for meaningful inquiry.
South Africa Anti-trust
CD
Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
Article
No Easy Escape From Gauteng’s Mandatory Mediation Regime
A recent Gauteng High Court judgment confirms that mandatory court-annexed mediation cannot be avoided simply because parties are hostile toward each other or believe the process will be futile. The court ordered an uncooperative defendant to participate in mediation, establishing that only exceptional circumstances will excuse parties from the process introduced by the Directive and Protocol.
South Africa Litigation
CD
Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
Article
Rescission Refused: Negligence Is Not Good Cause Under Rule 42(1)(a) Or The Common Law
The Supreme Court of Appeal examines whether a pension fund can successfully rescind a default judgment when its absence from proceedings resulted from internal administrative failures. The case explores the boundaries between procedural error and voluntary default, testing whether gross negligence in responding to legal process can be excused by the strength of a potential defence.
South Africa Litigation
E
ENS
Article
A Decision Six Years Late Is Not Only Late. It May Be Unlawful.
The Competition Appeal Court has set aside a Competition Tribunal decision delivered more than six years after the hearing concluded, finding that the delay and fragmented adjudicative process compromised the legality and fairness of the outcome. The judgment establishes that administrative bodies must maintain expeditious, coherent processes anchored in evidence, with decisions properly connected to the panels that heard the matter.
South Africa Litigation
FW
Fairbridges
See more