ARTICLE
15 May 2026

Waiting For Disclosure

FW
Fairbridges

Contributor

Fairbridges is a leading African law firm providing expert corporate and commercial legal services across South Africa and beyond. With offices in Cape Town and Johannesburg, we assist both local and multinational companies - our areas of expertise include commercial legal advisory, transactional work, commercial drafting, competition law (regulatory filings and litigation), intellectual property law, insurance and medical malpractice, healthcare regulatory advice, and commercial litigation. Our firm’s history (we were established in 1812) provides us with a rich legacy of institutional knowledge and a commitment to service excellence. This deep-rooted experience enables us to offer clients tailored, professional, and high-quality legal services at competitive rates. At Fairbridges, we pride ourselves on our ability to adapt to the evolving legal environment, embrace innovation and uphold the highest standards of the legal profession.
Litigation can sometimes feel like a long-running stage production. Pleadings are exchanged, attorneys correspond, dates are diarised, costs are incurred and everyone continues playing their part.
South Africa Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Wessel Robertson’s articles from Fairbridges are most popular:
  • with Senior Company Executives and HR

When liquidation happens mid-litigation, silence can be costly

Litigation can sometimes feel like a long-running stage production. Pleadings are exchanged, attorneys correspond, dates are diarised, costs are incurred and everyone continues playing their part.

But what happens when one of the actors has, legally speaking, already left the stage?

In a recent matter, litigation had been ongoing for some time before it emerged that the opposing parties had already been liquidated months earlier. No formal disclosure had been made. No withdrawal had been communicated by their attorneys. The matter simply continued, despite a material development that should have changed the way the litigation was approached.

That creates an obvious problem.

Once a party is placed in liquidation, the legal and practical position changes. The liquidator steps into the picture, creditors’ interests come to the fore, and active proceedings may need to be reviewed, paused, amended, or pursued through the correct insolvency process. Continuing as if nothing has happened can cause unnecessary costs, procedural confusion, and prejudice to the other litigants involved.

It is not merely an administrative courtesy to inform the other side. It is a material development that affects the conduct of the matter.

For creditors, the risk is that time and money may be spent pursuing litigation that should instead be dealt with through the liquidation process. For litigants, it may affect strategy, enforcement prospects, settlement discussions, and the identity of the proper party to deal with. For insolvency practitioners, it highlights the importance of quickly identifying active claims and proceedings involving the company in liquidation.

The takeaway is simple. Liquidation is not something that should be discovered by accident halfway through litigation.

When liquidation proceedings commence, all active litigation should be reviewed immediately. Attorneys, liquidators, directors, and creditors should ensure that relevant parties are informed, the correct procedural steps are taken and unnecessary legal costs are avoided.

In litigation, surprises are sometimes unavoidable. A liquidated opponent should not be one of them.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More