ARTICLE
21 October 2026

Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements: Enabling Opportunities For Expansion And Unlocking Value

SG
SNG Grant Thornton

Contributor

SNG Grant Thornton is the South African member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd. We have progressed expeditiously in every aspect since our establishment in 1985. We are an indigenous mid-tier assurance, tax and advisory firm with offices in South Africa and Eswatini.
An Agreed-Upon Procedures (AUP) Engagement involves an engagement team performing mutually agreed-upon procedures with the engaging party, presenting findings without providing assurance opinions or conclusions. These engagements can cover diverse financial and non-financial matters, from inventory verification and loan covenant compliance to system reviews and regulatory reporting, offering flexibility for organizations seeking specific procedural work tailored to their unique needs.
South Africa Accounting and Audit

Discover the Power of an Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagement.

In an Agreed-Upon Procedures (AUP) Engagement, the engagement team carries out procedures that have been mutually agreed upon with the engaging party (and, if applicable, other relevant parties). The engaging party confirms that the procedures are suitable for the engagement.

The engagement team presents the AUP performed and the related findings in the AUP report. The engaging party and other intended users assess the procedures and findings for themselves, forming their conclusions based on the work carried out by the engagement team.

An AUP engagement is not an audit, review, or other form of assurance engagement1. It does not involve gathering evidence to provide an opinion or an assurance conclusion, and therefore, no opinion or conclusion is expressed.

Unlock the Benefits: Why Choose an AUP Engagement?

Specific Focus:

AUP engagements let stakeholders target specific concerns without the scope of a full audit, such as comparing inventory records, verifying accounts receivable, and tracing grant funds.

Cost-Effective:

AUP engagements may be cost-effective depending on the scope of the engagement.

Flexibility:

AUP engagements are tailored to the client’s specific needs, allowing them to address issues not covered in a standard audit. This flexibility provides targeted reports and expert guidance, helping clients meet their goals with confidence.

Enhanced Transparency:

AUP engagements offer stakeholders clear insights into the procedures and results, fostering trust among investors, regulators, and management, while enabling effective monitoring and evaluation.

Regulatory Compliance:

AUP engagements can help meet regulatory requirements or work towards meeting regulatory requirements.

Risk Management:

Organisations use AUP engagements to assess specific risks or controls, identify weaknesses, and make improvements.

Stakeholder Communication:

AUP engagements provide clear findings for stakeholders, aiding discussions on performance or operational issues.

Interim Assessments:

Organisations use AUP engagements for interim assessments, enabling them to monitor and adjust specific areas between audits.

AUP Engagements on financial and non-financial matters

AUP engagements may relate to financial or non-financial subject matters. Examples of financial and non-financial matters that may be performed include:

Financial matters

  • Specific procedures on financial statements or specific classes of transactions, account balances, or disclosures within the financial statements, i.e. confirming inventory balances and inventory checking processes.
  • Eligibility of expenditures claimed from a funding program.
  • Bank loan covenants compliance evaluation.
  • Revenues for determining royalties, rent, or franchise fees based on a percentage of revenues.
  • Specific procedures for business acquisitions.
  • Anti-Money Laundering procedures
  • Calculations of financial ratios of projected cash flows for reporting to tax authorities.
  • Reconciliation between different financial reporting frameworks.
  • Liquidity evaluations.
  • Royalty agreements.
  • Internal control evaluation.
  • Specific procedures when buying, selling, or merging a business or part thereof.
  • Distributable retained earnings calculations and compliance assessment.

Non-financial matters

  • Numbers of passengers reported to a civil aviation authority.
  • Observation of destruction of fake or defective goods reported to a regulatory authority.
  • Data generating processes for lottery draws reported to a regulatory authority.
  • Third-party reviews.

AUP in the IT or systems space

  • Review of system against business requirements,
  • Systems or data migration,
  • Third-party API integratory draws reported to a regulatory authority.
  • Third-party reviews.

non-financial matters

AUP engagements may relate to financial or non-financial subject matters. Examples of financial and non-financial matters that may be performed include:

  • Specific procedures on financial statements or specific classes of transactions, account balances, or disclosures within the financial statements, i.e. confirming inventory balances and inventory checking processes.
  • Eligibility of expenditures claimed from a funding program.
  • Bank loan covenants compliance evaluation.
  • Revenues for determining royalties, rent, or franchise fees based on a percentage of revenues.
  • Specific procedures for business acquisitions.
  • Anti-Money Laundering procedures
  • Calculations of financial ratios of projected cash flows for reporting to tax authorities.
  • Reconciliation between different financial reporting frameworks.
  • Liquidity evaluations.
  • Royalty agreements.
  • Internal control evaluation.
  • Specific procedures when buying, selling, or merging a business or part thereof.
  • Distributable retained earnings calculations and compliance assessment.

Non-financial matters

  • Numbers of passengers reported to a civil aviation authority.
  • Observation of destruction of fake or defective goods reported to a regulatory authority.
  • Data generating processes for lottery draws reported to a regulatory authority.
  • Third-party reviews.

AUP in the IT or systems space

  • Review of system against business requirements,
  • Systems or data migration,
  • Third-party API integratory draws reported to a regulatory authority.
  • Third-party reviews.

SNG Grant Thornton is the South African member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd. We have progressed expeditiously in every aspect ever since our establishment more than 4 decades ago. We aim to help dynamic organisations unlock their potential for growth by providing meaningful, forward-looking advice. Proactive teams led by our approachable partners, use insight, experience, and instinct to understand complex clients and help them to find solutions. Our teams and member firms worldwide work and train together, sharing industry experience, technical expertise, and a commitment to excellence.

Looking for trusted references?

Reach out to us today and see how our professional services have made a difference for our clients!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More