ARTICLE
23 March 2026

Joint And Several Liability In Shareholders' Agreements

BK
Bär & Karrer

Contributor

Bär & Karrer is a leading Swiss law firm with more than 200 lawyers in Zurich, Geneva, Lugano, Zug, Basel and St. Moritz. Our core business is advising our clients on innovative and complex transactions and representing them in litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings. Our clients range from multinational corporations to private individuals in Switzerland and around the world. Most of our work has an international component. We have broad experience handling cross-border proceedings and transactions. Our extensive network consists of correspondent law firms which are all market leaders in their jurisdictions. Bär & Karrer was repeatedly awarded Switzerland Law Firm of the Year by the most important international legal ranking agencies in recent years.
The Parties to a Swiss law governed shareholders' agreement agreed therein that the minority shareholders may exercise a put option towards the “Majority Shareholder”. The term “Majority Shareholder”...
Switzerland Corporate/Commercial Law
Christoph Neeracher’s articles from Bär & Karrer are most popular:
  • with Finance and Tax Executives

A recent decision of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court highlights the risk of joint and several liability among parties to a shareholders' agreement.

Background
The Parties to a Swiss law governed shareholders' agreement agreed therein that the minority shareholders may exercise a put option towards the “Majority Shareholder”. The term “Majority Shareholder” was defined as “the person holding at least 50% of the shares plus one share, or a group of shareholders jointly holding at least 50% of the shares plus one share, even if such group was formed only temporarily to exercise one of the rights set out below.

Two minority shareholders exercised the put option and requested, based on the definition of the term “Majority Shareholder”, payment of the purchase price from 4 other shareholders as joint and several debtors.

Decision
The Federal Supreme Court held in its judgment 4A_607/2024 that the 4 other shareholders (who were related among each other) formed a simple partnership – with the consequence that they were indeed jointly and severally liable to the minority shareholder. The court arrived at such conclusion based on (i) the (ambiguous) definition of “Majority Shareholder in the shareholders' agreement, (ii) the fact that the family members jointly communicated towards the minority shareholder, and (iii) certain court precedent and legal doctrine that qualified shareholders' agreements as simple partnerships.

Remarks
Under Swiss law, a simple partnership (einfache Gesellschaft) exists where parties agree to combine their efforts or resources to achieve a common goal (CO 530). Absent other agreement the members of a simple partnership are jointly and severally liable towards third parties for engagements of the partnership (CO 544 III). A number of legal scholars are of the view that the parties to a shareholders' agreement may, depending on the circumstances, form a simple partnership – with the consequence that they are jointly and severally liable.

To avoid such undesired ramification to the extent possible it is advisable to explicitly state in the shareholders' agreement that

  • the parties do not form a simple partnership and waive the respective provisions to the extent possible, and
  • there shall be no joint and several liability among any of the parties thereto.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More