ARTICLE
14 July 2026

Ireland’s 2026 EU Presidency: Focusing On The Financial Services Files That Matter

PL
PwC Legal Germany

Contributor

In today’s rapidly evolving marketplace, our clients are increasingly concerned with business collaborations, restructuring, mergers and acquisitions, financing and questions of social responsibility. They need legal security when dealing with such complex issues. That is why we work closely with PwC’s tax, human resources and finance experts and draw on the resources of our legal network in more than 100 countries to deliver comprehensive advice. Whether a global player, a public body or a wealthy individual, each client can rely on a personal account manager to address his or her specific legal needs. This dedication helps us ensure our client’s long-term business success. PwC Legal. More than 220 lawyers at 18 locations. Integrated legal advice for the real world.
Ireland's 2026 EU Presidency signals a decisive shift in European financial services regulation, prioritizing competitiveness and delivery over deliberation. With the Savings and Investment Union and Digital Euro...
Ireland Finance and Banking
Michael Huertas’s articles from PwC Legal Germany are most popular:
  • within Finance and Banking topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Banking & Credit industries

EU RegCORE Client Alert | Banking Union and Capital Markets Union + Savings and Investment Union

QuickTake

On 1 July 2026, Ireland assumed the rotating Presidency of the Council of the European Union for the period 1 July to 31 December 2026. The Irish Presidency’s Policy Programme1 confirms that financial services are no longer being treated merely as a regulated sector but as infrastructure for European competitiveness. The Programme is structured around three pillars—competitiveness, values and security—and states plainly that “Ireland’s 2026 EU Presidency will be defined by action and by delivery.”

The Presidency coincides with the political aftershock of the Draghi Report on competitiveness and the Letta Report on the future of the Single Market.2 The Programme expressly carries forward the priorities identified in those reports, with the One Europe, One Market Roadmap—agreed by the Council, the European Commission and the European Parliament—providing the blueprint for decisive progress. The Roadmap provides a shared, time-bound delivery framework for competitiveness and Single Market reform, giving Ireland’s Presidency more political leverage on economic files than it would otherwise possess.

The operational consequence for financial services firms is significant: the Presidency appears to be signalling it intends to use the six-month window for delivery, not deliberation. In the Programme’s own words: “We will use all the tools available to the Presidency to facilitate agreement on the priority files in line with the agreed targets.” For banks, insurers, asset managers, market infrastructure providers, payment firms and fintechs, the indication is that EU financial services regulation is being reframed through competitiveness, resilience and security rather than through post-crisis risk reduction alone.

The programme’s organising architecture is structured around three pillars: competitiveness, values and security. This tripartite framing structures how the Council’s working time will be allocated, which files are treated as priorities, and how the Presidency will broker trade-offs between competing legislative demands.

Key elements to consider include:

  • What. The Irish Presidency’s overarching priority for ECOFIN is competitiveness. Priority will be given to achieving the targets on the Savings and Investments Union (SIU) and the Digital Euro, with action focused on deepening European capital markets and strengthening the competitiveness of Europe’s banking sector.
  • When. 1 July to 31 December 2026. The One Europe, One Market Roadmap sets ambitious timelines, with multiple files targeted for trilogue conclusion or significant progress by year-end 2026.
  • Who. All regulated financial services firms operating in the EU—including banks, insurers, asset managers, investment firms, market infrastructure providers, payment firms and fintechs—as well as national competent authorities and EU institutions. Ireland’s position as host to the European headquarters of a disproportionate number of global financial institutions means this is a Presidency that understands the regulatory, supervisory and commercial environment in which cross-border financial services operate.
  • Where. All 27 EU Member States. The Presidency chairs all Council working groups, COREPER and most ministerial Council configurations. In trilogue negotiations with the European Parliament, the Presidency speaks for the Council, tables compromise texts and determines the pace of inter-institutional negotiation.
  • Why. The Presidency’s measures are clear that “Europe must act urgently to enhance its competitiveness and productivity”. The current global environment is described as “unstable and deeply challenging,” with the Presidency responding to external factors through determined action on competitiveness, values and security. The 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework negotiations will also be an overarching priority.
  • How. Firms may wish to map exposure to the key files, prepare advocacy positions while the window remains open, reframe regulatory strategy around competitiveness, reassess product and infrastructure strategy and integrate regulatory, geopolitical and operational resilience planning.
  • What the Presidency cannot do. The Presidency cannot legislate alone. It cannot override the European Commission's exclusive right of legislative initiative—if the Commission has not tabled a proposal, the Presidency cannot negotiate one into existence. It cannot bind the European Parliament, which is a co-legislator with its own timeline, priorities and political dynamics. It cannot force unanimity among Member States in the Council, and on sensitive files (particularly tax, foreign policy and treaty change) its ability to broker outcomes depends entirely on the willingness of capitals to compromise. Critically, the Presidency is constrained to six months. Files that require longer negotiation may see their momentum dissipate when the next Presidency recalibrates priorities.

Read the full article

Download

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More