India: Construction & Planning

Subscribe
Real estate law and construction law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering topics such as construction and planning, conveyancing, estate management, land law and agriculture, and real estate law.
Video
Does MOFA Still Matter? Bombay High Court On Deemed Conveyance In Township Projects | Podcast Bites (Video)
The Bombay High Court's recent judgment in Flagship Infrastructure Limited examines whether the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act (MOFA) continues to apply to deemed conveyance proceedings in township projects. This podcast episode analyzes the court's interpretation of statutory provisions and their implications for property developers and flat owners in Maharashtra's real estate sector.
India Real Estate
IL
IndiaLaw LLP
Video
Does MOFA Still Matter? Bombay High Court On Deemed Conveyance In Township Projects | Podcast Bites
The Bombay High Court recently delivered a significant judgment in Flagship Infrastructure Limited addressing the applicability of Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act (MOFA) provisions to deemed conveyance proceedings in township projects. This ruling examines whether traditional flat ownership regulations extend to large-scale residential developments and what implications this holds for property rights in integrated townships.
India Real Estate
IL
IndiaLaw LLP
Article
Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Releasing Thane Land From “Private Forest” Acquisition: Implications For Forest Land Classification, TDR And Development Rights
In a significant interim order impacting forest land disputes, urban development, and Transferable Development Rights (TDR) in Maharashtra, the Supreme Court has stayed the operation of the Bombay High Court’s judgment directing the release of approximately 193 acres of land at Manpada, Thane from acquisition under the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975.
India Environment
KS
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article
Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal Findings On Delay Analysis Using The Critical Path Method And Reiterates Limits Of Section 34 Review
The Delhi High Court (“Delhi HC”), in Ircon International Limited vs. Afcons Infrastructure Limited1, has provided important guidance on the evaluation of critical path analysis and delay attribution in construction disputes. The Delhi HC examined whether an arbitral tribunal’s findings on delay, based on project schedules and critical path analysis, could be interfered with under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”).
India Litigation
J
JSA
See more

Latest Videos

See more