India: Insolvency/Bankruptcy

Subscribe
Insolvency law and bankruptcy law articles, thought leadership, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering topics surrounding financial restructuring, insolvency and bankruptcy.
Article
Developer Insolvency: What It Means For Homebuyers, Their Flats And Their Money
When a property developer enters insolvency proceedings under India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, homebuyers who have invested their life savings face critical questions about their rights and remedies. This comprehensive analysis examines the legal framework governing builder insolvency, explaining how homebuyers are classified as financial creditors, their role in the Committee of Creditors, and the practical steps they must take to protect their interests through the Corporate Insolvency Resolution
India Insolvency
MC
MAHESHWARI & CO. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article
Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture Of EMD Where Liquidation Auction Terms Expressly Provide For It
In M/s ASJ Finsolutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Vikram Bajaj, the Supreme Court considered whether the Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) and other amounts paid by a successful bidder in a liquidation auction can be forfeited where the e-auction notice expressly so provides, even though the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 (the “Regulations”) do not expressly provide for forfeiture.
India Insolvency
IL
IndiaLaw LLP
Article
Emergence Of Project-Wise Insolvency In India
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) was originally built as a monolithic architecture. Its primary mandate was clear: when a company defaults, the entirety of its corporate entity must be pulled into the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). While this unified entity approach worked seamlessly for manufacturing units or simple corporate structures, its application to the real estate sector triggered catastrophic systemic failures. In real estate, a single developer frequently manages dozens of independent housing projects across varying stages of lifecycle, funding, and construction.
India Insolvency
MC
MAHESHWARI & CO. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article
Legal Implications Of Technical Write-Off And Avoidance (PUFE) Applications In Insolvency Proceedings
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”)1 represents a watershed in India’s corporate insolvency framework. It seeks to consolidate laws relating to insolvency and ensure time-bound resolution of distressed entities while protecting the value of assets and promoting equitable treatment of creditors. Parallel to the IBC regime, the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) regulates the manner in which banks and financial institutions treat non-performing assets in their books of account.
India Insolvency
ML
MZM Legal
Article
Bombay High Court Restrains Hamon Cooling Systems From Using The ‘HAMON’ Mark In John Cockerill Hamon SA’s Favour
The Bombay High Court has restrained Hamon Cooling Systems Private Limited (“Defendant No. 1”) from using the mark HAMON, holding that John Cockerill Hamon SA (the “Plaintiff”) had made out a strong prima facie case that it is the proprietor of the HAMON trade marks in India, and that Defendant No. 1’s use of the marks — traceable to a now-expired “Brand Usage Right” granted following a cross-border insolvency-driven transfer of the Hamon group’s global IP portfolio — amounted to infringement and passing off. The Order was passed by Justice Arif S. Doctor on 6th July 2026, allowing the Plaintiff’s Interim Application seeking to restrain Defendant No. 1 from using “HAMON COOLING” and “HCS HAMON COOLING” as trade marks and as part of its corporate name.
India IP
SR
S.S. Rana & Co. Advocates
Article
SEBI Clarifies Scope Of Regulation 62A: Transfer Of Unlisted NCDs Under A Business Transfer Arrangement Does Not Circumvent Listing Requirements
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in its recent informal guidance dated 20 July 2026 (Informal Guidance), has clarified that Regulation 62A of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, as amended (LODR Regulations), applies to outstanding unlisted non-convertible debentures, which was are transferred to a debt listed entity pursuant to any corporate restructuring or business transfer.
India Finance
KC
Khaitan & Co LLP
Article
Supreme Court Affirms Piercing Of The Corporate Veil In CIRP
In a significant ruling dated May 5, 2026, the Supreme Court of India in Alpha Corp Development Private Limited v. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority reinforced the legal principle that a corporate debtor’s subsidiaries may not always be treated as legally distinct entities during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”). The Court’s reasoning was anchored not only in established doctrine but also in a pointed evaluation of the conduct of a statutory authority that failed to engage with the CIRP process in any meaningful way.
India Insolvency
SR
S.S. Rana & Co. Advocates
Article
IBC Update - Removal Of Interim Moratorium For Personal Guarantors Apples To Pending Proceedings
The Bombay High Court recently addressed a critical question regarding the temporal application of Section 96(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which removed the interim moratorium protection for personal guarantors of corporate debtors. The ruling clarifies whether this amendment applies only to fresh applications filed after its enactment or extends to insolvency proceedings that were already pending when the law changed. This decision has significant implications for creditors seeking to pursue p
India Insolvency
MH
Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co.
Article
NCLAT Holds That Jurisdiction Exercised By The Adjudicating Authority Must Be Tested With Reference To The Source Of The Relief Granted
The NCLAT, Principal Bench through its judgment dated 03.08.2026 in the matter of Ammeet Kumar Agarwal vs. Ssarvi Resolution Services LLP, Resolution Professional of Supreme Transport Organisation Pvt. Ltd., affirmed the order of the NCLT, Mumbai directing the suspended directors of the Corporate Debtor to jointly and severally restore funds to the Corporate Debtor’s account withdrawn during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
India Commercial
Sagus Legal
Article
Bombay High Court Holds Liquidator's Arbitration Invocation Effective From Date Of NCLT Approval
In Tecpro Systems Limited (In Liquidation) v. Reliance Infrastructure Limited1, the Bombay High Court considered whether a notice invoking arbitration, issued by a liquidator before obtaining the prior approval of the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 33(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the "IBC"), was void and incapable of supporting an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the "Arbitration Act"). The Court held that prior approval is mandatory.
India Litigation
Trinity Chambers
Article
Can A Resolution Applicant Withdraw Or Renegotiate After CoC Approval? Supreme Court Clarifies
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC” or “Code”) seeks to provide for a time-bound resolution of corporate insolvency, maximisation of the value of assets and balancing the interests of stakeholders. A crucial component of this framework is the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”), which evaluates and approves resolution plans in accordance with its commercial wisdom.
India Insolvency
KS
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article
Real Estate Newsletter Aug 2026
For nearly two years, setting up a new industrial unit or undertaking industrial expansion in the Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ) required the leave of the Supreme Court. On 23.07.2026, this position changed when the Court modified the restriction imposed in October 2024, permitting the TTZ Authority to process approximately 400 pending applications for industrial projects in the region, subject to a prescribed scrutiny mechanism.
India Real Estate
KS
King, Stubb & Kasiva
See more