ARTICLE
5 August 2025

LD Düsseldorf July 30, 2025 Decision On Merits, UPC_CFI_26/2024

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
The Court can reject a new line of arguments pursuant to R. 9.2 RoP in a case where the issue has been raised from the outset and the new argument is based on completely different passages...
Germany Intellectual Property

1 Key takeaways

Late filed argument based on known document

The Court can reject a new line of arguments pursuant to R. 9.2 RoP in a case where the issue has been raised from the outset and the new argument is based on completely different passages of a lengthy document. Neither the Court nor the other party may be forced to deal with it from scratch. This undermines the concept of the front-loaded procedure established by the Rules of Procedure.

2 Division

LD Düsseldorf

3 UPC number

UPC_CFI_26/2024

4 Type of proceedings

Infringement action / counterclaim for revocation

5 Parties

Claimant:

Headwater Research LLC

Defendants:

Samsung Electronics GmbH

Samsung Electronics France, S.A.S.

Samsung Electronics Benelux B.V.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

6 Patent(s)

EP 3 110 069 B1

7 Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 9.2 RoP

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More