All Topics

The Unified Patent Court's Court of Appeal issued a significant ruling on evidence production requests in appeal proceedings involving Network System Technologies LLC and Qualcomm entities. This case addresses procedural matters under Rule 190 of the Rules of Procedure concerning three European patents related to telecommunications technology.

A Munich Local Division ruling addresses whether a counterclaim for patent revocation that transitions from unconditional to conditional status—dependent on a finding of infringement—remains subject to unconditional limitation requirements under Rule 263.3 of the Rules of Procedure. The case involves Papst Licensing's infringement action against Roborock entities concerning EP 3 030 943, with implications for procedural strategy in UPC patent disputes.

German insolvency law's principle of equal creditor treatment faces a critical challenge through Section 131 of the Insolvency Code, which addresses "incongruent coverage" - situations where creditors receive security or satisfaction they weren't entitled to receive, or not in that form or timing. The practical stakes are substantial: within the last month before insolvency filing, objective incongruence alone suffices for avoidance actions, with no requirement to prove the creditor's knowledge of the debto