ARTICLE
22 June 2026

The Netherlands Authority For Consumers And Markets – Blocking Kpn/glaspoort Acquisition Of Delta Fiber’s Fiber-optic Networks

N
Nazali

Contributor

“Nazali is a law firm founded by Ersin Nazali, providing a wide range of legal services (consultancy and litigation in all areas of law) to its national and international clients, through its trustworthy and experienced legal team. There are thirteen partners, forty lawyers, four sworn financial advisors and ten certified public accountants working for Nazali. Our philosophy is quality in delivery, timely response and business minded approach.“
The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (“ACM”) has prohibited Glaspoort, a joint venture between KPN and APG, from acquiring parts of Delta Fiber Nederland’s fiber-optic networks.
Netherlands Consumer Protection

The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (“ACM”) has prohibited Glaspoort, a joint venture between KPN and APG, from acquiring parts of Delta Fiber Nederland’s fiber-optic networks. The transaction concerned network assets covering approximately 200,000 households across several regions in the Netherlands.

ACM found that the transaction would significantly reduce competition in fixed broadband markets by diminishing the role of independent fiber network operators. In the affected regions, the market structure would effectively shift from three competing network infrastructures to only two, namely KPN and VodafoneZiggo. In some areas, telecom providers without their own networks (such as Odido and Budget) would become fully dependent on access to KPN’s infrastructure.

A key concern for ACM was the strengthening of KPN’s already dominant position in fiber-optic networks. Delta is currently one of the largest independent fiber network operators and provides open access to competing service providers, thereby reducing dependency on KPN. ACM concluded that its partial acquisition would lead to the disappearance or weakening of this competitive constraint, with no realistic expectation of new network entry.

As a result, ACM expected higher wholesale and retail prices, reduced consumer choice, and lower service quality. Given the essential societal importance of telecommunications infrastructure, ACM considered these competitive harms particularly significant. ACM also assessed proposed remedies by KPN and Glaspoort but concluded that they were insufficient to address the structural loss of competition. 

(ACM – 08.06.2026)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More