- within Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)
- with readers working within the Metals & Mining, Pharmaceuticals & BioTech and Utilities industries
Welcome to the latest installment of Arnold & Porter's Virtual and Digital Health Digest. This digest covers key virtual and digital health regulatory and public policy developments during December 2025 and early January 2026 from the the United Kingdom, and European Union.
December 2025 saw a significant wave of regulatory, policy, and technological developments across the UK and EU that will shape the digital health landscape in 2026 and beyond. The UK advanced its focus on safe and effective AI integration in health care through the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency's (MHRA) open call for evidence on AI regulation, and the publication of the AI Security Institute's (AISI) Frontier AI Trends Report, which underscores both the promise and risks of rapidly advancing AI capabilities. In parallel, the EU proposed substantial amendments to the Medical Devices Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) — introducing new rules for software, cybersecurity, and digital compliance — alongside publishing the first part of the Biotech Act and a new Code of Practice on transparency for AI-generated content, each reinforcing expectations for trustworthy and innovation supportive digital health ecosystems. Globally, the International Medical Device Regulators Forum's (IMDRF) 2026-2030 strategic plan emphasized harmonization in response to emerging technologies. Finally, product liability frameworks are also being modernized, as the UK Law Commission launched a comprehensive review of the Consumer Protection Act to ensure it adequately captures risks associated with AI-enabled technologies, including iterative updates and latent defects.
Regulatory Updates
UK MHRA Publishes an Open Call for Evidence on the
Regulation of AI in Healthcare. This invites responses
from both UK-based and international stakeholders. The responses
gathered will help to inform the recommendations of the National
Commission into the Regulation of AI in Healthcare (launched in
September 2025 and discussed in the October 2025 Digest) when advising the MHRA on
the regulation of new AI technologies in the NHS and wider health
care system. The main topics covered are: how the UK regulatory
framework covering AI in health care should be improved, how issues
around the safe use of AI can be addressed, and the distribution of
responsibility between regulators, companies, and health care
organizations. The call for evidence closes on February 2,
2026.
European Commission Publishes Proposals To Amend
the MDR and IVDR. The proposal marks a significant
step in the reform of the EU medical devices regulatory framework.
For medical devices and biotech companies, key elements of the
proposals include: (1) revised classification rules for certain
software medical devices, which could fall into lower risk classes
with less onerous obligations; (2) new EU and national regulatory
sandboxes to support innovative digital health technologies,
including software medical devices; (3) new cybersecurity safety
and performance requirements; and (4) further digitalization of
compliance processes, including the possibility to submit EU
declarations of conformity in digital form. The proposals have been
submitted to the European Parliament and the Council of the
European Union for review, and a public feedback period is open from January 7 to
March 5, 2026. Further details on the proposals can be read in our
December 2025 BioSlice Blog.
European Commission Publishes Proposal on the EU
Biotech Act — Part 1. While primarily focused on
the pharmaceutical sector, with a broader biotech initiative
expected in 2026, the proposal includes certain elements relevant
to medical device and biotech companies. These include (1) expanded
EU and national regulatory sandboxes, which could extend to medical
devices and novel health biotechnology products and therapies; (2)
the possibility to submit a single application for authorization
through the Clinical Trial Information System for combined studies
(i.e. studies involving clinical trials of medicinal products
alongside clinical investigations of medical devices or performance
studies of in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs)); (3) the
possibility for AI-enabled IVDs or AI medical devices used in
combined studies to be subject to a coordinated assessment for
authorization; and (4) the obligation for the European Medicines
Agency to issue guidance on the use of AI across the lifecycle of
medicinal products. The proposal will now be discussed by the
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
European Commission Publishes First Code of
Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content. The
code is intended to support companies placing AI systems on the
market (AI deployers) and companies using AI systems to generate or
manipulate content (AI providers) in complying with the
transparency obligations under the EU AI Act, which will come into
effect on August 2, 2026. The code clarifies the responsibilities
imposed on AI providers and AI deployers by the EU AI Act. In
particular, AI providers must ensure that any AI-generated
or materially manipulated content is marked and detectable using
layered technical measures, such as including the provenance
information and watermarking. Separately, AI deployers
must disclose the level of AI involvement in the content that has
been generated or manipulated by AI where it could mislead the
public, using an immediately visible indicator, with the code
suggesting a linguistic acronym pending an EU-wide solution.
Although voluntary, the code provides a useful guide for medical
device companies on regulatory expectations. The final version of
the code, which has been subject to a public consultation that is
now closed, is expected to be published in 2026.
UK AI Security Institute (AISI) Frontier AI Trends
Report Published. The report highlights rapid advances
in frontier AI systems that are directly relevant to digital
health. Models now surpass PhD level expertise in biology and
chemistry, which signals new potential for digital health
initiatives, such as AI enabled diagnostics, clinical decision
support, and drug-disease modelling. The report also shows
significant gains in autonomous task completion and cybersecurity
capabilities, underscoring both opportunities for improving
workflows and the need for robust safeguards as industries,
including health care systems, adopt increasingly powerful AI
tools.
International Medical Device Regulators Forum
Publishes Strategic Plan for 2026-2030. The plan
highlights that the advancement of innovative technologies,
including AI and machine learning, may require the development of
new procedures, which presents an opportunity for harmonization of
risk-based and resource-proportionate approaches. To this end, the
priorities of the IMDRF include publishing new technical documents
on innovative technologies and continuing with joint workshops with
the IMDRF industry group.
Privacy Updates
The UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
Publishes Response to the Cyber Security Resilience
Bill. The bill, which was introduced to Parliament in
November 2025, was prepared following public consultation and calls
for views on proposals to improve the UK's cyber resilience.
The response highlights efforts to strengthen the UK's cyber
defense framework and improve the resilience of essential digital
services. Although digital health is not directly named, the update
is relevant since digital health systems — such as cloud
based clinical platforms, remote care services, diagnostic AI
tools, and electronic health records infrastructure — rely on
the same digital service providers (e.g., cloud computing, online
services, and managed service providers) that fall under the
bill's expanded regulatory oversight. The reforms also include
extending the scope of what is considered essential services
— for example, suppliers to the National Health Service may
be considered designated critical suppliers. The ICO has indicated
a need for additional clarification of the criteria for assessing
"critical suppliers" and further details on the duties
involved.
European Commission Renews the UK Adequacy
Decisions. Following Brexit, the UK is considered a
"third country" to the EU, and as such, the transfer of
personal data without an adequacy decision would ordinarily be
prohibited. The adequacy decisions, originally made in 2021 and now
renewed in December 2025, allow personal data to flow freely
between the UK and the EU under the General Data Protection
Regulation and under the Law Enforcement Directive.
Product Liability Updates
UK Law Commission Publishes Terms of Reference for Product Liability Law Review. The Law Commission notes that the current regime under the Consumer Protection Act does not sufficiently address challenges posed by technological advancement, such as AI. The issues that will be considered in the review include the definitions of "product" and "defect," to ensure that any harm that may be caused by the use of AI is taken into account. The Law Commission will also review the possibility of amending the "State of the Art" defense, that the defectiveness of a product is determined by the knowledge and the market at the date of supply, to take account of the fact that some technologies can be updated iteratively. Finally, the possibility of bringing latent defects (arising after the date of supply) in scope will also be considered.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.