ARTICLE
18 August 2026

The State of Employment Law: 27 States Have Restrictions on Lie Detectors in Employment

BT
Barnes & Thornburg LLP

Contributor

In a changing marketplace, Barnes & Thornburg stands ready at a moment’s notice, adapting with agility and precision to achieve your goals. As one of the 100 largest law firms in the United States, our 800 legal professionals in 23 offices put their collective experience to work so you can succeed.
Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia impose restrictions on private employers' use of polygraph tests, but these limitations vary significantly in scope and application. From Massachusetts's broad definition of "lie detectors" that may encompass AI interview analysis to Virginia's narrow prohibition on questions about sexual activities, employers face a complex patchwork of regulations.
United States Employment and HR
Douglas Oldham’s articles from Barnes & Thornburg LLP are most popular:
  • with Inhouse Counsel
  • with readers working within the Healthcare, Technology and Media & Information industries

In this series, we will explore some of the ways states vary from one another in their employment laws.

At some point, every employer encounters an applicant or an employee who seems to be stretching the truth, if not telling an outright lie. While some employers might be tempted to test those workers’ truthfulness with a polygraph test, 27 states and the District of Columbia place restrictions on private employers’ use of lie detectors.

Of course, the devil is in the details, and not all of these state restrictions are the same. Most of these states restrict all private employer demands or requests that an applicant or employee submit to a polygraph test. However, some states are broader in their restrictions. For example, Massachusetts defines “lie detector” more expansively than just a polygraph test and also includes any “device, mechanism, instrument or written examination” used to detect deception, and multiple lawsuits have been filed over the question of whether artificial intelligence scans of recorded interviews constitute “lie detectors” under state law.

Other states are narrower in their restrictions. Virginia does not have across-the-board restrictions on private employers’ use of polygraph tests. It only prohibits employers from asking prospective employees about sexual activities. Tennessee and Illinois also place specific limitations on certain sensitive topics instead of prohibiting all polygraph tests.

A few states not only prohibit the use of lie detector tests, but also place affirmative obligations on employers to notify applicants that they will not use such tests. Maryland and Massachusetts, for example, both have specific requirements for employment applications. Employers must conspicuously state that no lie detector tests will be required.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More