ARTICLE
11 May 2026

Washington AG Targets Grocery Stores Over BOGO Offers

KD
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Contributor

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP is an AmLaw 200, Chambers ranked, full-service law firm of more than 350 attorneys and other professionals. For more than 180 years, Kelley Drye has provided legal counsel carefully connected to our client’s business strategies and has measured success by the real value we create.
Washington's Attorney General has filed a lawsuit against Albertsons Companies, alleging that the grocery chain deceived consumers through "Buy One, Get One Free" promotions by inflating prices before sales and then reducing them afterward. The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny of pricing transparency practices in retail, particularly as grocery costs remain a significant concern for consumers.
United States Washington Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP are most popular:
  • within Antitrust/Competition Law topic(s)

“Buy One, Get One Free” promotions can be a good way to entice consumers who are looking for deals, but those promotions can lead to legal headaches if the math behind the deals doesn’t add up. 

Last week, Washington Attorney General Nick Brown filed a lawsuit against Albertsons Companies—the parent company of Safeway, Albertsons, and Haggen grocery stores—alleging that the grocery stores used deceptive “BOGO” promotions that overcharged consumers across the state. 

According to the complaint, the stores advertised BOGO deals on various products while quietly increasing the price of the “buy one” item in the weeks or months before the promotion. After the promotion ended, the prices were allegedly reduced to pre‑promotion levels. 

For example, the complaint alleges that one store increased the price of olive oil by 57% ahead of a BOGO promotion before dropping it back to the original price after the promotion ended. The AG argues that these promotions trick consumers into thinking that they’re getting a better deal than they are. Although they may get an item for “free,” they are paying an inflated price for another.

The AG estimates that the grocery stores overcharged Washington consumers on more than 3 million transactions, resulting in approximately $19.7 million in revenue from deceptive promotions. The AG wants the court to stop the grocery stores’ use of deceptive promotions, provide restitution to Washington consumers, and pay civil penalties for each violation of state law as well as pre-judgment interest.

This case fits squarely within a renewed regulatory enforcement focus on pricing transparency at a time when grocery costs are top of mind for consumers. Pricing issues are also becoming a focus in the wave of email marketing lawsuits that we’ve written about. For more information on those, you can register for our webinar on May 12.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More