ARTICLE
6 May 2026

Is A Conditional Job Offer A Binding Contract?

d
didlaw

Contributor

Not just another law firm, the emphasis at didlaw has always been about providing an exceptional level of client service. This means clear and practical advice, explained in plain English. It means going the extra mile for our clients to find the right solution.

We started in 2008, focusing on helping people who were having difficulties around health and disability at work. By 2018, we were widely recognised as the UK’s leading disability discrimination lawyers.

In 2019 didlaw began a new chapter in its story. Our MD, Karen Jackson joined forces with employment barrister, Elizabeth George, to embark on the next ambitious phase of the firm’s journey.

The two women have expanded the firm’s offering to provide the same level of expertise but across all areas of employment and discrimination law. And they are committed to making didlaw a truly values-driven firm in everything that it does. You can read more about the values that drive them on our website.

In Kankanalapalli v Loesche Energy Systems the Claimant was offered a job as a project manager subject to receipt of satisfactory references and a right to work check.
United Kingdom Employment and HR
Karen Jackson’s articles from didlaw are most popular:
  • in United Kingdom
didlaw are most popular:
  • within Law Department Performance topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives

It depends. 

In Kankanalapalli v Loesche Energy Systems the Claimant was offered a job as a project manager subject to receipt of satisfactory references and a right to work check. Mr K accepted the offer and began taking steps towards starting his new job. When the company withdrew the offer before his start date for reasons which were unrelated to references or the right to work check, Mr K argued that this amounted to a breach of contract due to lack of notice. 

A first instance employment tribunal found that no binding contract had arisen because the conditions of the offer (references & the right to work check) had not been satisfied and therefore the employer was entitled to withdraw the offer and no right to notice arose.

Mr Kankanalapalli appealed the decision and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) agreed with him: the employer was not entitled to withdraw the offer without notice.

The EAT held that:

  • The tribunal did not properly consider whether the offer conditions were conditions subsequent or conditions precedent. Conditions subsequent are conditions which apply after the contract begins. Conditions precedent are conditions which must be met before the contract can come into existence.
  • In this instance the conditions were conditions subsequent. They did not prevent the creation of the contract. Had Mr Kankanalapalli been unable to meet them they could have ended the contract. They rescinded the offer for other reasons but a contract still had been formed. 
  • On the facts of this case the offer letter had set out the key contractual terms of the offer and the individual had begun taking steps to prepare for employment in the new role. A contract had been formed. 
  • A term requiring reasonable notice had to be implied into the formed contract. Given that this was an offer for a senior role with a lengthy recruitment process, three months’ notice was found to be appropriate. 
  • In withdrawing the offer without notice the employer was in breach of contract. 

The conclusion: get your ducks in a row before formalising an offer?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More