ARTICLE
24 November 2025

The Employment Rights Bill Ping Pong

d
didlaw

Contributor

Not just another law firm, the emphasis at didlaw has always been about providing an exceptional level of client service. This means clear and practical advice, explained in plain English. It means going the extra mile for our clients to find the right solution.

We started in 2008, focusing on helping people who were having difficulties around health and disability at work. By 2018, we were widely recognised as the UK’s leading disability discrimination lawyers.

In 2019 didlaw began a new chapter in its story. Our MD, Karen Jackson joined forces with employment barrister, Elizabeth George, to embark on the next ambitious phase of the firm’s journey.

The two women have expanded the firm’s offering to provide the same level of expertise but across all areas of employment and discrimination law. And they are committed to making didlaw a truly values-driven firm in everything that it does. You can read more about the values that drive them on our website.

We might have thought that the Employment Rights Bill would have received Royal Assent by now and have been well on its way to becoming an Act, but no.
United Kingdom Employment and HR
Karen Jackson’s articles from didlaw are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Aerospace & Defence industries
didlaw are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR and Technology topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel

We might have thought that the Employment Rights Bill would have received Royal Assent by now and have been well on its way to becoming an Act, but no. Just as Pantomime season gets ready to begin, the legislative ping pong between the House of Commons and the House of Lords continues.

The Bill returned to the Commons on 5 November 2025. The Commons rejected significant non-government amendments that the Lords had agreed on 28 October 2025. The Lords' amendments were debated, and further amendments were proposed by the government.

One of the major bones of contention for the Lords is the six-month qualifying period for unfair dismissal rights.

The Commons disagreed with the Lords' amendment on this and voted through further amendments, which included a statutory duty to consult on key aspects of the unfair dismissal framework, including an initial period of employment and the compensatory award applicable during the initial period.

The problem with the proposal to make unfair dismissal a day-one right is that this was a manifesto commitment by the Labour government, and they seem adamant that it should pass. During the Report Stage in the House of Lords, the Lords passed an amendment requiring a six-month qualifying period in an attempt to assuage fears about the economic and tribunal impacts of the new law. The Commons rejected this amendment on 15 September, but the Lords pursued it again at the end of October.

The government appears committed to delivering unfair dismissal protections from day one, which most employment commentators, whether claimant or respondent-based, agree is not a sensible idea at all.

The Bill has gone back to the Lords on 17 November 2025. Will the Lords insist on their amendments, prolonging the ping pong further until one side concedes? We watch and wait. What is clear is that the legislative timetable is likely to slide unless agreement can be reached soon. We'll keep you posted.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More