ARTICLE
24 November 2025

Supreme Court Clarified That Party Must Seek Declaratory Relief Before Claiming Specific Performance

The Supreme Court, through its judgment dated 29.10.2025 in Annamalai v. Vasanthi & Ors. , clarified the circumstances under which a plaintiff must first seek a declaration that the termination of the contract is invalid before pursuing specific performance of the contract.
India Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sagus Legal LLP’s articles from Sagus Legal are most popular:
  • within Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)
  • in European Union
  • with readers working within the Law Firm industries
Sagus Legal are most popular:
  • within Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Real Estate and Construction and Technology topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives and HR

The Supreme Court, through its judgment dated 29.10.2025 in Annamalai v. Vasanthi & Ors.1, clarified the circumstances under which a plaintiff must first seek a declaration that the termination of the contract is invalid before pursuing specific performance of the contract.

The Supreme Court held that where a contract grants a lawful right of termination and such right is duly exercised, the plaintiff must first obtain a declaration that the termination is invalid before seeking specific performance. Conversely, where the termination is without contractual basis or the right to terminate has been waived through subsequent conduct, such termination amounts only to wrongful repudiation. In such cases, the plaintiff may treat the contract as subsisting and directly seek specific performance without any prior declaratory relief.

Footnote

1 Civil Appeal No. 13076-13077 of 2025

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More