ARTICLE
16 September 2026

Hong Kong Cracks Down On Unpaid Wages With Director Sentencing

LS
Lewis Silkin

Contributor

We have two things at our core: people – both ours and yours - and a focus on creativity, technology and innovation. Whether you are a fast growth start up or a large multinational business, we help you realise the potential in your people and navigate your strategic HR and legal issues, both nationally and internationally. Our award-winning employment team is one of the largest in the UK, with dedicated specialists in all areas of employment law and a track record of leading precedent setting cases on issues of the day. The team’s breadth of expertise is unrivalled and includes HR consultants as well as experts across specialisms including employment, immigration, data, tax and reward, health and safety, reputation management, dispute resolution, corporate and workplace environment.
A Hong Kong director was sentenced to 120 hours of community service and ordered to pay HK$93,000 in outstanding wages after her companies failed to pay employees on time. The case demonstrates that corporate officers can face serious criminal liability, including fines up to HK$350,000 and three years' imprisonment, when employment law breaches occur with their consent, connivance, or neglect.
Hong Kong Employment and HR
Jezamine Fewins’s articles from Lewis Silkin are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR topic(s)
  • with Inhouse Counsel
  • with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy industries

On 4 September 2026, a director of Grace (Asia) Group Limited and CY Medical Aesthetics Limited was sentenced at Fanling Magistrates' Courts to 120 hours' community service after the companies wilfully and without reasonable excuse failed to pay three employees’ wages within seven days after their wage periods ended and their employment contracts were terminated, in breach of the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) (“EO”).

The director was also ordered to pay approximately HK$93,000 in outstanding wages to the affected employees.

The Labour Department prosecuted the director and convicted her on the basis that the offences were committed with her consent, connivance, or neglect.

The sentence serves as a stark reminder that breaches of Hong Kong employment legislation can carry serious criminal consequences not just for the company but also its directors. Under section 63C of the EO, an employer who wilfully and without reasonable excuse fails to pay wages when they become due commits a criminal offence punishable by a fine of up to HK$350,000 and imprisonment for up to three years.

Crucially, corporate status provides no shield. Under section 64B of the EO, where an offence is committed by a corporate entity and it is proven to have been committed with the consent or connivance of, or to be attributable to the neglect of, any director, manager, or similar officer, that inpidual is personally liable for the offence and liable to the same penalties.

The Labour Department's enforcement activity is not merely theoretical. According to the Hong Kong Government's 2026–27 Budget estimates, the Labour Department pursued 2,756 prosecutions in respect of employees' rights and benefits in 2025, following 3,592 prosecutions in 2024, with an estimated 2,800 planned for 2026. These figures are supported by approximately 150,000 workplace inspections conducted annually.

The Labour Department regularly issues press releases publicising convictions of employers and directors for EO offences. In recent months there has been multiple convictions for the same core offending, namely failing to pay employees' wages and/or Labour Tribunal awards on time, with fines imposed ranging from HK$66,000 to HK$117,000 as well as a suspended sentence of imprisonment for a director in July 2026. The range of sentences reflects the courts' willingness to escalate penalties in line with the seriousness and persistence of the offending.

Directors and senior officers are reminded to ensure that wages, termination payments, and tribunal awards are paid within the statutory deadlines, and treat payroll compliance as a non-negotiable governance priority rather than an afterthought left to the accounts department.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More