Elias Neocleous & Co LLC is the largest law firm in Cyprus and a leading firm in the South-East Mediterranean region, with a network of offices across Cyprus (Limassol, Nicosia, Paphos), Belgium (Brussels), Czech Republic (Prague), Romania (Budapest) and Ukraine (Kiev). A dynamic team of lawyers and legal experts deliver strategic legal solutions to clients operating in key industries across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, India, USA, South America, and China. The firm is renowned for its expertise and jurisdictional knowledge across a broad spectrum of practice areas, spanning all major transactional and market disciplines, while also managing the largest and most challenging cross-border assignments. It is a premier practice of choice for leading Cypriot banks and financial institutions, preeminent foreign commercial and development banks, multinational corporations, global technology firms, international law firms, private equity funds, credit agencies, and asset managers.
Cross-border parental responsibility disputes raise complex questions of jurisdiction, particularly where children have become settled in another country. The Cyprus Court of Appeal recently examined whether Cypriot courts had jurisdiction over four children who had relocated to Germany, where they were living, attending school, and integrating socially.
Anna Demetriou’s articles from Elias Neocleous & Co LLC are most popular:
within Family and Matrimonial topic(s)
in United States
with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services and Retail & Leisure industries
Elias Neocleous & Co LLC are most popular:
within Family and Matrimonial, Law Department Performance, Media, Telecoms, IT and Entertainment topic(s)
with Senior Company Executives and HR
Cross-border parental responsibility disputes raise complex questions of jurisdiction, particularly where children have become settled in another country.
In a recent decision, the Cyprus Court of Appeal confirmed that jurisdiction must be determined by reference to the children’s habitual residence at the time the proceedings are filed, taking into account their real-life integration into their social and family environment. The case concerned four children who had relocated to Germany, where they had been living, attending school, and integrating socially.
Upholding the first-instance decision, the Court of Appeal found that the Cypriot courts lacked jurisdiction, as the children’s habitual residence was in Germany.
The judgment reinforces that, in international family law, the child’s best interests remain central, with courts focusing on the child’s actual circumstances rather than formal or disputed parental positions.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
