ARTICLE
28 October 2009

BRE Bank Notification Clause Declared Unlawful

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang logo

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

A clause requiring borrowers to inform BRE Bank about all circumstances that could potentially impair their financial situation has been declared unlawful by the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection.
Poland Finance and Banking

A clause requiring borrowers to inform BRE Bank about all circumstances that could potentially impair their financial situation has been declared unlawful by the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection.

The court noted that borrowers were required under existing laws to provide the bank with this information, but their obligation concerned only documents necessary for an assessment of their financial situation.

The court ruled that the clause almost always entitled the bank to declare a breach of contract as the circumstances it envisaged could be interpreted broadly. It will be therefore entered in the Register of Prohibited Clauses.

The clause was one of two BRE Bank clauses challenged by the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection.

The other clause, which was declared lawful, allowed the bank's management board to change the interest rate of renewable loans. The court decided that the bank did not have complete discretion as the parameters allowing rate changes were commonly known and easily accessible by borrowers.

Although the decision is not a binding precedent, it may influence the ruling in another complaint made to the OCCP which is attracting much attention in Polish media. An organisation comprising clients of the bank are conducting a public campaign to renegotiate their mortgage contracts on the grounds that the bank unlawfully changed their interest rates.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 27/10/2009.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More