Australia: Directors and Officers

Subscribe
Business law and corporate law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering topics that involve business and corporate law produced by specialists working in this area every day.
Article
Mobile Asset Minority Shareholder Successfully Challenges Drag-along Provisions Before The Takeovers Panel
In Mobile Asset Holdings Ltd [2026] ATP 7, the Takeovers Panel considered a situation where the Board, directors of which represented 50%+ of the shareholdings in the company, put a resolution to shareholders for a constitutional amendment which would enable them to compel all shareholders to sell their shares (aka drag-along rights) without the usual guardrails. This blank cheque approval request was most likely going to be approved, given the voting majority who benefited from it were themselves voting, but for the successful application to the Takeovers Panel of an individual applicant.
Australia Commercial
KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Article
Some Lessons From The Humm Situation
When a takeover proposal is received, the board must rigorously assess whether any director has a personal interest that could be affected by the outcome of the proposal. If there is any reasonable perception of a lack of independence — even if the director believes they can act impartially — that director should be excluded from the board's consideration of the matter and an independent board committee should be formed.
Australia Commercial
KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Article
AI And Directors’ Duties: Navigating Cyber Risk And Responsible Governance
Artificial intelligence is reshaping corporate governance in two critical ways: boards must defend against increasingly sophisticated AI-powered cyber attacks while simultaneously navigating the responsible use of AI tools in their own decision-making processes. Recent regulatory guidance from ASIC and a landmark Federal Court decision establish new expectations for how directors should manage AI-related risks and leverage AI capabilities while fulfilling their fiduciary duties.
Australia Commercial
HR
Holding Redlich
Article
Missing The Red Flag: Lessons From ASIC v Bekier & Ors For Company Directors
The Federal Court's decision in ASIC v Bekier & Ors examines when company directors breach their duty of care and diligence under the Corporations Act, particularly when red flags emerge in high-risk industries. The case clarifies the boundaries between permissible reliance on management and the duty to actively investigate warning signs, with significant implications for both executive and non-executive directors navigating anti-money laundering risks and corporate governance obligations.
Australia Commercial
HR
Holding Redlich
See more