ARTICLE
2 December 2025

Litigation To Invalidate City Of Yes Zoning For Housing Opportunity Dismissed

KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Contributor

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer is a world-leading global law firm, where our ambition is to help you achieve your goals. Exceptional client service and the pursuit of excellence are at our core. We invest in and care about our client relationships, which is why so many are longstanding. We enjoy breaking new ground, as we have for over 170 years. As a fully integrated transatlantic and transpacific firm, we are where you need us to be. Our footprint is extensive and committed across the world’s largest markets, key financial centres and major growth hubs. At our best tackling complexity and navigating change, we work alongside you on demanding litigation, exacting regulatory work and complex public and private market transactions. We are recognised as leading in these areas. We are immersed in the sectors and challenges that impact you. We are recognised as standing apart in energy, infrastructure and resources. And we’re focused on areas of growth that affect every business across the world.
On November 12, 2025, Justice Lizette Colon of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Richmond County, dismissed a petition challenging the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity zoning text amendment (COYHO).
United States Real Estate and Construction
Valerie G. Campbell’s articles from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP are most popular:
  • within Real Estate and Construction topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Retail & Leisure industries
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP are most popular:
  • within Transport, Environment and Law Department Performance topic(s)
  • in United States

On November 12, 2025, Justice Lizette Colon of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Richmond County, dismissed a petition challenging the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity zoning text amendment (COYHO). The petitioners had asked the court to invalidate COYHO in its entirety; Justice Colon dismissed their lawsuit in full.

As we previously described, the petitioners in the lawsuit alleged numerous violations of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and the City Environmental Quality Review process. In its Decision and Order dismissing the case, the court rejected the petitioners' arguments and concluded that the City had fulfilled its environmental review obligations. The court determined that the petitioners' objections to COYHO ultimately arose from policy preferences — not deficiencies in the environmental review process — observing that "[i]t is not the place of the court to second-guess policy decisions, nor interject policy opinions into this review of SEQRA compliance."

COYHO is the most comprehensive reform of the New York City Zoning Resolution since its passage in 1961. As noted by the City's lawyers, the lawsuit threatened to wreak havoc on housing development across New York City. This dismissal therefore brings welcome comfort to the proponents of the many projects that are proceeding under COYHO's regulations, which include updated standards for residential conversions, expanded regulations for affordable housing, relaxed parking requirements, and new mechanisms for transferring floor area from landmark buildings (among many other important changes).

The dismissal remains subject to appeal. If the petitioners decide to appeal the decision, they will need to file a notice of appeal within 30 days (which clock will begin to run as soon as either party files a notice of entry of the dismissal).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More