United States: Copyright

When hiring creators to develop copyrighted works for your business, understanding the critical differences between assignments, licenses, and work-for-hire agreements can mean the difference between owning...

Transfer pricing complexities emerge as artificial intelligence systems increasingly rely on vast training datasets, raising critical questions about how multinational corporations should value and allocate these intangible assets across jurisdictions. The intersection of AI development and international tax law presents novel challenges for determining arm's length pricing when data crosses borders within corporate structures.

The Supreme Court's decision in Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment addresses a fundamental question about internet service provider liability: when does knowledge of customer infringement cross the line into legal responsibility?

Explore how some of Britain's most iconic brands—from Burberry's distinctive plaid to Harry Potter's magical empire—have navigated the complex landscape of U.S. trademark law.

The Tenth Circuit's decision in Whyte Monkee Productions v. Netflix affirms fair use protection for Tiger King's documentary use of copyrighted funeral footage, clarifying that transformative secondary works need not...

Courts are grappling with a fundamental question as AI capabilities advance: can artificial intelligence be recognized as a creator of intellectual property rights, or must it remain classified as a tool wielded by human actors? Recent judicial decisions across multiple IP regimes reveal a consistent refusal to extend legal personhood or creative agency to AI systems, while new regulatory frameworks in California...

For years, AI companies have told courts, regulators, and the public the same thing: their models don’t store copies of training data. OpenAI put it plainly to the U.S. Copyright Office in 2023...

On April 6, 2026, the Artemis II crew swung around the far side of the moon, shattered the Apollo 13 distance record by traveling nearly 253,000 miles from home, and enjoyed front-row...

The U.S. Supreme Court has clarified when internet service providers can be held liable for copyright infringement by their users, establishing that mere knowledge of infringing activity is insufficient.